In multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-pNETs) are the most frequently diagnosed NETs and a leading cause of MEN1-related death. The high prevalence and malignant potential of NF-pNETs outline the need for an evidence-based screening program, as early diagnosis and timely intervention could reduce morbidity and mortality. Controversies exist regarding the value of several diagnostic tests. This systematic review aims to evaluate current literature and amplify an up-to-date evidence-based approach to NF-pNET diagnosis in MEN1. Three databases were systematically searched on the diagnostic value of biomarkers and imaging modalities. Twenty-seven studies were included and critically appraised (modified Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies). Another 12 studies, providing data on age-related penetrance and tumor growth, were included to assess the optimal frequency and timing of screening. Based on current literature, biomarkers should no longer play a role in the diagnostic process for NF-pNETs, as accuracies are too low. Studies evaluating the diagnostic value of imaging modalities are heterogeneous with varying risks of bias. For the detection of NF-pNETs, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has the highest sensitivity. A combined strategy of EUS and MRI seems to be the most useful. Gallium 68 octreotate-DOTA positron emission tomography-CT could be added if NF-pNETs are diagnosed to identify metastasis. Reported growth rates were generally low, and two distinct phenotypes were observed. Surveillance programs should focus on and be adapted to the presence of substantial growth in NF-pNETs. The optimal age to start screening must yet be determined, as insufficient evidence for an evidence-based recommendation was available.
The aim of this study was to investigate whether younger age at surgery is associated with the increased incidence of postoperative complications after prophylactic thyroidectomy in pediatric patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) 2.The shift toward earlier thyroidectomy has resulted in significantly less medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC)-related morbidity and mortality. However, very young pediatric patients might have a higher morbidity rate compared with older patients. Hardly any literature exists on complications in the very young.A retrospective single-center analysis was performed on the outcomes of MEN2 patients undergoing a prophylactic total thyroidectomy at the age of 17 or younger. Forty-one MEN2A and 3 MEN2B patients with thyroidectomy after January 1993 and at least 6 months of follow-up were included, subdivided in 9 patients younger than 3 years, 15 patients 3 to 6 years, and 20 patients older than 6 years. Postoperative hypocalcemia and other complications were registered.Twelve (27%) patients developed transient hypocalcemia and 9 (20%) patients suffered from permanent hypocalcemia, with a nonsignificant trend toward higher incidence with decreasing age. Three (7%) patients had other complications, of whom 2 were younger than 3 years.For patients younger than 3 years, the average length of stay (LOS) was 6.7 days, versus 1.7 and 3.5 days, respectively, for the older patient groups (P < 0.05). Patients with complications had a longer LOS compared with patients without (5.0 vs 2.0, P < 0.01).None of the patients had clinical signs of recurrent MTC after a mean follow-up of 10.5 years.Prophylactic thyroidectomy in very young children is associated with a higher rate of complications, causing a significant increased LOS. Irrespective age of surgery, MTC did not recur in any patient. In planning optimal timing of surgery, clinicians should take the risk of complications into account. We advise not to perform total thyroidectomy before the age of 3 for patients defined high risk by the American Thyroid Association guideline.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.