In one-third of cases of tilt-induced asystolic reflex syncope, asystole occurred too late to have been the primary cause of TLOC. Reliance on electrocardiography data only is likely to overestimate the importance of asystole.

Rationale: Assessing the relative contributions of cardioinhibition and vasodepression to the blood pressure (BP) decrease in tilt-induced vasovagal syncope (T-VVS) requires methods that reflect BP physiology accurately. Objective: To assess the relative contributions of cardioinhibition and vasodepression to T-VVS using novel methods. Methods and Results: We studied the parameters determining BP, i.e. stroke volume (SV), heart rate (HR) and total peripheral resistance (TPR), in 163 patients with T-VVS documented by continuous ECG and video EEG monitoring. We defined the beginning of cardioinhibition as the start of a heart rate decrease (HR) before syncope, and used logarithms of SV-, HR- and TPR-ratios to quantify the multiplicative relation BP=SV·HR·TPR. We defined three stages before syncope and two after it based on direction changes of these parameters. The earliest BP decrease occurred nine minutes before syncope. Cardioinhibition was observed in 91% of patients at a median time of 58 s. before syncope. At that time SV had a strong negative effect on BP, TPR a lesser negative effect, while HR had increased (all p<0.001). At the onset of cardioinhibition, median HR was at 98 bpm higher than baseline. Cardioinhibition thus initially only represented a reduction of the corrective HR increase, but was nonetheless accompanied by an immediate acceleration of the ongoing BP decrease. At syncope, SV and HR contributed similarly to the BP decrease (p<0.001), while TPR did not affect BP. Conclusions: The novel methods allowed the relative effects of SV, HR and TPR on BP to be assessed separately, even though all act together. The two major factors lowering BP in T-VVS were reduced SV and cardioinhibition. We suggest that the term 'vasodepression' in reflex syncope should not be limited to reduced arterial vasoconstriction, reflected in TPR, but should also encompass venous pooling, reflected in SV.

Reflex syncope is responsible for 1-6% of hospital admissions and the economic burden of syncope is huge. A considerable part of these high costs is still spent on tests that are not indicated. Till now few neurologists have taken an interest in syncope and tilt table testing (TTT). However, reflex syncope and epilepsy are often in each other's differential diagnosis and require a similar emphasis on history taking and deductive reasoning. A TTT can be helpful for diagnosis and treatment. The pathophysiological rationale behind the TTT is the fact that it uses gravity to provoke a downwards shift of blood that in turn triggers syncope. Various indications and methods of the TTT are discussed in this paper.

No abstract