Magnetic induction tomography (MIT) is a contactless technique that is used to image the distribution of passive electromagnetic properties inside a voluminous body. However, the central area sensitivity (CAS) of this method is critically weak and blurred for a low conductive volume. This article analyzes this challenging issue, which inhibits even faint imaging of the central interior region of a body, and it suggests a remedy. The problem is expounded via two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) eddy current simulations with different transmitter geometries. On this basis, it is shown that a spatially undulating exciter coil can significantly improve the CAS by >20 dB. Consequently, the central region inside a low conductive voluminous object becomes clearly detectable above the noise floor, a fact which is also confirmed by practical measurements. The improved sensitivity map of the new arrangement is compared with maps of more typical circular MIT geometries. In conclusion, 3D MIT reconstructions are presented, and for the same incidence of noise, their performance is much better with the suggested improvement than that with a circular setup. reconstruction of a faint image of the interior. Improved CAS promotes the reconstruction of the conductivity distribution throughout the volume, which is the topic of this work.Typically, in the annular MIT setups that have been reported in previous studies-in which multiple transmitters and receiver coils are arranged around a low conductive saline cylinder [1,2,4-9]-the CAS becomes virtually zero [2,3] (Figure 1a,b). This problem is often bypassed by using a shallow conductive saline cylinder, where the inserted perturbation approaches the more sensitive top and/or bottom plane (quasi-2D [1,2,4,5], as seen in Figure 1d) or, alternatively, by only using the signals that originate from perturbations near the sensitive circumference [4,[6][7][8][9] (Figure 1a-c). The signals are calculated using Equation (1), i.e., with the differential eddy currents in the conductive volume and the virtual vector potential of the receiver. The methods used to calculate the maps are described in Sections 2.3 and 2.4. Only one excitation coil and two receiving coils at characteristic positions are shown here to demonstrate the general effects. 3D imaging requires many more coils around the conductive cylinder and at different heights [10]. However, a poor CAS remains a problem for all other pairs of transmitter and receiver loops.More closely related to the MIT geometries discussed in this article, Igney et al.[11] described a planar array MIT with exciter and receiver coils in a gradiometric arrangement. Our recently reported MIT scanner [12] is still technically similar to the methods described therein, and an experiment ( Figure 2) highlights the addressed problem with the central region of a body, qualitatively related to the weak CAS, shown in Figure 1. In this experiment, a test body travels linearly through an opposing and planar arrangement of a single exciter coil and a ...

Magnetic induction tomography (MIT) is a contactless, low-energy method used to visualize the conductivity distribution inside a body under examination. A particularly demanding task is the three-dimensional (3D) imaging of voluminous bodies in the biomedical impedance regime. While successful MIT simulations have been reported for this regime, practical demonstration over the entire depth of weakly conductive bodies is technically difficult and has not yet been reported, particularly in terms of more realistic requirements. Poor sensitivity in the central regions critically affects the measurements. However, a recently simulated MIT scanner with a sinusoidal excitation field topology promises improved sensitivity (>20 dB) from the interior. On this basis, a large and fast 3D MIT scanner was practically realized in this study. Close agreement between theoretical forward calculations and experimental measurements underline the technical performance of the sensor system, and the previously only simulated progress is hereby confirmed. This allows 3D reconstructions from practical measurements to be presented over the entire depth of a voluminous body phantom with tissue-like conductivity and dimensions similar to a human torso. This feasibility demonstration takes MIT a step further toward the quick 3D mapping of a low conductive and voluminous object, for example, for rapid, harmless and contactless thorax or lung diagnostics.

No abstract

Electro-magnetic acoustic transducers (EMATs) are intended as non-contact and non-destructive ultrasound transducers for metallic material. The transmitted intensities from EMATS are modest, particularly at notable lift off distances. Some time ago a concept for a "coil only EMAT" was presented, without static magnetic field. In this contribution, such compact "coil only EMATs" with effective areas of 1-5cm(2) were driven to excessive power levels at MHz frequencies, using pulsed power technologies. RF induction currents of 10kA and tens of Megawatts are applied. With increasing power the electroacoustic conversion efficiency also increases. The total effect is of second order or quadratic, therefore non-linear and progressive, and yields strong ultrasound signals up to kW/cm(2) at MHz frequencies in the metal. Even at considerable lift off distances (cm) the ultrasound can be readily detected. Test materials are aluminum, ferromagnetic steel and stainless steel (non-ferromagnetic). Thereby, most metal types are represented. The technique is compared experimentally with other non-contact methods: laser pulse induced ultrasound and spark induced ultrasound, both damaging to the test object's surface. At small lift off distances, the intensity from this EMAT concept clearly outperforms the laser pulses or heavy spark impacts.

A simple copper coil without a voluminous stationary magnet can be utilized as a non-contacting transmitter and as a detector for ultrasonic vibrations in metals. Advantages of such compact EMATs without (electro-)magnet might be: applications in critical environments (hot, narrow, presence of iron filings…), potentially superior fields (then improved ultrasound transmission and more sensitive ultrasound detection). The induction field of an EMAT strongly influences ultrasound transduction in the nearby metal. Herein, a simplified analytical method for field description at high liftoff is presented. Within certain limitations this method reasonably describes magnetic fields (and resulting eddy currents, inductances, Lorentz forces, acoustic pressures) of even complex coil arrangements. The methods can be adapted to conventional EMATS with a separate stationary magnet. Increased distances (liftoff) are challenging and technically relevant, and this practical question is addressed: with limited electrical power and given free space between transducer and target metal, what would be the most efficient geometry of a circular coil? Furthermore, more complex coil geometries ("butterfly coil") with a concentrated field and relatively higher reach are briefly investigated.