Urothelial carcinomas account for the majority of all primary bladder cancers, making bladder cancer the second most frequent genitourinary malignancy after prostate cancer. Bladder cancer risk rises with age and most of them return after resection due to their multifocal distribution, and they often develop in superficial locations. Like many other cancers, bladder carcinoma is associated with a few tumor markers that have been evaluated in the past. They include p53, p63, and HER2. This study was conducted on 88 patients suspected of urinary bladder carcinoma. This prospective study was done at the Department of Pathology, Osmania General Hospital, Hyderabad from August 2017 to July 2019. Of the 88 patients, 76 were diagnosed with bladder carcinoma and the remaining 12 were non-neoplastic. The primary neoplastic lesions of the urinary bladder were predominantly seen in patients older than 40 years and were found to be statistically significant (p<0.01). Of the 34 cases of high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma (PUC), 26 (76.47%) were males, eight cases (23.53%) were females, while among the 25 cases of low-grade PUC, 20 cases (80%) were males, and five cases (20%) were females. In seven cases of squamous cell carcinoma, six cases (85.71%) were males and only one case (14.29%) was female. Of the two cases of adenocarcinoma, male and female gender accounted for one case each (50%). The two cases of papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential were males in the study. On the whole, the primary urinary bladder lesions are more predominant in the males (77.63%) than the females (22.37%). Overexpression of p53 is negatively connected to p63 expression, and HER2 and p53 were strongly associated with high tumor grade in urothelial carcinoma.

Introduction The most common cancer in women is, by far, breast cancer. The incidence and mortality of breast cancer must be reduced by a multidisciplinary strategy that includes education campaigns, preventive measures, screening programmes for early diagnosis, and the availability of treatment facilities. The use of immunohistochemical (IHC) stains with relative specificity for myoepithelial markers has become a mainstay of standard diagnostic breast pathology because the presence and distribution of myoepithelial cells might differ greatly amongst the distinct breast proliferation. Although it has also been reported that DOG1 is expressed in other mesenchymal tumours, DOG1 has been demonstrated to be sensitive and specific for the detection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Both myoepithelial cells (MECs) and luminal epithelial cells have occasionally displayed DOG1 immunoreactivity in the breast. Materials and methods This prospective cross-sectional study was done in the Department of Pathology at Osmania General Hospital, Hyderabad on 60 cases from June 2017 to June 2019. Female patients with different breast lesions including benign proliferating lesions, ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS), and invasive carcinoma breast cases were included in the study. Inflammatory lesions, mesenchymal, and metastatic tumors were excluded. IHC expression of DOG1 as a myoepithelial marker to discriminate invasive from non-invasive breast lesions was evaluated and correlated with clinicopathological features. Results The mean age of the study population was 33.67 ± 8.48 in the benign group and 54.43 ± 12.84 in the malignant group. Fifty percent (15) of the patients with benign lesions belonged to the age group 20-30 years, whereas 26.7% (8) of the patients with malignant lesions belonged to the age group 61-70 years. DOG-1 expression was strongly positive in fibroadenoma, ductal hyperplasia, fibrocystic disease, whereas strongly negative in malignant disease of the breast ( p < 0.0001). P63 expression was strongly positive in benign breast diseases and strongly negative in malignant diseases ( p < 0.0001). Conclusion DOG1 seems to be similar to p63 as a myoepithelial cell marker both in normal breast tissue and in benign lesions. DOG1 is strongly positive in benign breast diseases and strongly negative in malignant breast diseases. Hence, it can be considered as a useful myoepithelial marker in differentiating invasive breast carcinoma and non-invasive breast lesions.