BackgroundDiscordance between patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and their rheumatology health care providers is a common and important problem. The objective of this study was to perform a comprehensive clinical evaluation of patient-provider discordance in RA.MethodsA cross-sectional observational study was conducted of consecutive RA patients in a regional practice with an absolute difference of ≥ 25 points between patient and provider global assessments (possible points, 0–100). Data were collected for disease activity measures, clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and medications. In a prospective substudy, participants completed patient-reported outcome measures and underwent ultrasonographic assessment of synovial inflammation. Differences between the discordant and concordant groups were tested using χ2 and rank sum tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to develop a clinical model of discordance.ResultsPatient-provider discordance affected 114 (32.5%) of 350 consecutive patients. Of the total population, 103 patients (29.5%) rated disease activity higher than their providers (i.e., ‘positive’ discordance); only 11 (3.1%) rated disease activity lower than their providers and were excluded from further analysis. Positive discordance correlated with negative rheumatoid factor and anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies, lack of joint erosions, presence of comorbid fibromyalgia or depression, and use of opioids, antidepressants, or anxiolytics, or fibromyalgia medications. In the prospective study, the group with positive discordance was distinguished by higher pain intensity, neuropathic type pain, chronic widespread pain and associated polysymptomatic distress, and limited functional health status. Depression was found to be an important mediator of positive discordance in low disease activity whereas the widespread pain index was an important mediator of positive discordance in moderate-to-high disease activity states. Ultrasonography scores did not reveal significant differences in synovial inflammation between discordant and concordant groups.ConclusionsThe findings provide a deeper understanding of patient-provider discordance than previously known. New insights from this study include the evidence that positive discordance is not associated with unrecognized joint inflammation by ultrasonography and that depression and fibromyalgia appear to play distinct roles in determining positive discordance. Further work is necessary to develop a comprehensive framework for patient-centered evaluation and management of RA and associated comorbidities in patients in the scenario of patient-provider discordance.

IntroductionThe patient global assessment of disease activity is a crucial component of various measures of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Our objective was to identify underlying latent traits driving the patient global assessment using a quantitative, multivariable data reduction approach.MethodsThis was a prospective cross-sectional study of consecutive patients with RA. The patient sample was stratified to include 50 patients with patient-provider discordance (i.e., at least 25-mm absolute difference between the patient and provider global assessments) and 20 patients with patient-provider concordance (i.e., less than 25-mm absolute difference between the patient and provider global assessments). Data were collected from the most recent rheumatology visit, including patient characteristics, current RA medications, and comorbidities. Participants completed several validated patient-reported outcome measures. The data were evaluated using factor analysis, and then linear regression was used to determine the variability in the patient global assessment explained by the factor scores.ResultsThe study included 70 patients with mean age of 61 years, 73% female, and with mean disease duration of 8 years. The means (SD) for the patient and provider global assessments were 44.6 (22.7) and 20.1 (17.7), respectively. Factor analysis yielded eight factors that represented measurements of pain, fatigue, depression or anxiety symptoms, prior diagnosis of depression or anxiety, advanced age and degenerative arthritis, inability to participate, fibromyalgia (clinical diagnosis and Widespread Pain Index), and undetermined. Linear regression analysis showed that fibromyalgia explained the greatest proportion of the variance in the patient global assessment followed by the other factors.ConclusionLatent factors underlying the patient global assessment include pain, depression and anxiety, inability to participate, fibromyalgia, advanced age, and degenerative arthritis.

Objective:The objective was to identify longitudinal predictors of discordance between patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and their health care providers, where patient global assessment of disease activity is substantially higher than provider global assessment. Methods:This retrospective case-control study included 102 cases with positive discordance (ie, ≥25 mm between patient and provider global assessments) and 102 controls without discordance who were matched for age, sex, RA duration, and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI). Data were collected at the baseline visit (date of diagnosis or earliest available visit), the index visit (participation in a previous cross-sectional study), and at up to 11 additional visits before the index visit. Data included patient characteristics, disease activity measures, disease activity score in 28 joints for C-reactive protein with the 3-variable version (DAS28-CRP[3]), and medications. Data were analyzed by using linear and logistic regression models with smoothing splines for nonlinear trends.Results: Overall, the mean age was 63 years, 75% were female, and mean RA duration was 10 years. Compared with controls, cases had higher rates of discordant visits during the 4 years before the index visit, and they had higher CDAI and DAS28-CRP(3) earlier in the disease course. Cases more frequently had antinuclear antibodies, nonerosive disease, prior depression, or prior use of antidepressants or fibromyalgia medications. Disease-modifying medication use was not different between cases and controls. Conclusion:The findings inform new hypotheses about the relationships of disease activity and antinuclear antibodies to the later occurrence of positive discordance among patients with RA.

Determinants of changes in disease activity among patients with juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) are unknown. Our objective was to develop predictive models to predict changes in disease activity using the CARRA Legacy Registry. The CARRA Legacy Registry included 658 subjects with definite or probably JDM with 297 subjects with a one follow-up visit after baseline, and we studied the 65 subjects with active disease at baseline. Linear regression models were used to build risk scores for changes in disease activity adjusted for baseline disease activity, age, sex, and disease duration. Disease activity improved from baseline to 6-month follow-up as measured by patient/parent global health score (median 4; p = 0.008), patient pain score (median 2; p = 0.014), physician global (median 4; p < 0.001), and Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale (CMAS) (median 41, p < 0.001). Anti-nuclear antibodies (p = 0.013) and hydroxychloroquine use (p = 0.045) were significant predictors of less improvement in patient/parent global and baseline patient/parent global. Anti-nuclear antibodies (p = 0.001) and V/shawl sign (p = 0.005) were significant predictors of less improvement in patient pain (R-square improved from 0.29 for adjustors alone to 0.46 for the full model). Small joint arthritis (p < 0.01) predicted less improvement and dysphagia/dysphonia (p = 0.033) predicted greater improvement in CMAS and baseline CMAS (R-square improved from 0.73 for adjustors alone to 0.86 for the full model). Disease characteristics can help identify patients who are less likely to improve over time. Risk scores to predict future changes in disease activity could be used to trigger more aggressive treatment earlier in the disease course.