Background: Cholecystectomy is currently a frequently performed operation. The presence of gallstones within either the gallbladder or biliary tree is associated with the bacterial colonization of the bile. Acute cholangitis spans a continuous clinical spectrum and can progress from a local biliary infection to advanced disease with sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Therefore, it is important to know the microbiological flora of the gallbladder before prophylactic antibiotics are given. Aims & objectives: To evaluate the microbiological profile of bile from gall bladder in patients undergoing cholecystectomy. To determine the appropriate antibiotic for preoperative prophylaxis in cholecystectomy patients based on the microbiological profile of bile. Methods: The study was a prospective study carried out in SSG Hospital. A total of 78 patients undergone cholecystectomy who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. 3cc bile was aspirated from all patients, this collected bile from gallbladder before cholecystectomy was transported to the laboratory in sterile test-tube. The specimen was evaluated to find out whether it is sterile or has any bacteria present. The types of bacteria are determined and whether the amount of isolate is significant or not. And sensitivity to antibacterial agents against antibiotics was determined. Results: 19 patients showed positive bile culture in which Escherichia coli was the most common isolated bacteria (63.16% among positive bile culture and 15.38% among all patients) and bile was sterile in 59 patients (75.64%). Other organisms isolated were Pseudomonas (3.85%), Klebsiella (2.56%), coagulase negative Staphylococcus and Staphylococcus viridans (1.28%). Positive bile culture was a more common finding (50% of patients were bile culture positive) in patients with acute cholecystitis in this study. Post-operative wound infection is more common (15.79%) in group of patients with isolated organism from bile. There is a strong correlation between bile culture and wound culture (75%). Conclusions: It was found that sensitivity to third-and fourth-generation cephalosporins was higher as compared to aminoglycoside in acute as well as chronic cholecystitis. In this study levofloxacin also shows good sensitivity against isolated organism from bile. Piperacilin and tazobactum also shows good sensitivity against isolated organism from bile and they are more effective against pseudomonas. The resistance to second-generation cephalosporins and aminoglycoside has increased. For preoperative prophylaxis third and fourth-generation cephalosporins and levofloxacin show better promise and may be used as the first line of preoperative prophylaxis in operations for acute and chronic cholecystitis undergoing cholecystectomy.

Introduction Subxiphoid approach is emerging as an alternative to intercostal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). We sought to compare the clinical efficacy of both approaches. Method A protocol was registered at PROSPERO [CRD42020155686]. Studies were retrieved from literature in July 2020. The Main outcomes were operative duration, intraoperative complications and postoperative length of hospital stay (LoS). Subgroup analysis was performed by procedure type. Results 1469 patients (51% male) were included from 12 observational studies, with 620 (42%) having undergone sVATS. There was a high-moderate risk of bias across included papers. There was no difference in operative duration (MD 13.1 minutes, 95% CI -11.3 to + 37.6; p = 0.29), intraoperative complications (OR 0.17, 95% CI -0.28 to + 0.61; p = 0.47), or LoS (MD -0.8 days, 95% CI -1.8 to + 0.2; p = 0.08). LoS was lower for sVATS thymectomy (MD -1.7 days, 95% CI -2.9 to -0.3; p = 0.01). Acute pain (10-point numerical rating scale) was lower for sVATS (MD -2.2, 95% CI -3.2 to -1.2; p < 0.001). There was insufficient data to report on chronic pain, quality of life, or surgeon workload. Conclusions There is a potential benefit for sVATS in selected procedures. Well-designed randomised trials with consistent outcome reporting are required.

Background: Traditionally nasogastric decompression is carried out in post operatively in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. The purpose of the study is to assess the benefits of nasogastric decompression in the early postoperative period as compared to routine nasogastric decompression in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgeries. Objectives: To assess the benefits of nasogastric decompression in the early postoperative period as compared to routine nasogastric decompression in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgeries, to assess the complications associated with nasogastric tube insertion, and to assess the effect of early nasogastric tube removal on the patients' postoperative morbidity and comfort level. Methods: This was a randomized control trial done in the Shree Sayajirao General Hospital, Vadodara. According to patient flow and previous study details the estimated sample size was 300 patients. Patient allotment was 150 patients in each group. Patients admitted on odd dates will be followed for routine nasogastric decompression, and patients admitted on even dates will be followed for early nasogastric decompression. Inclusion criteria for the study include laparotomies performed by any abdominal incisions on emergency as well as elective bases. Variables to be studied were patient comfort (according to patient's opinion), vomiting (episodes, type, amount, content, on which postoperative day), abdominal distension, appearance of normal bowel sounds, passage of flatus and/or stools (according to patient's history), incidence of aspiration pneumonia and total duration of the hospital stay with wound complications. Data will be processed and analyzed by chi square test and t-test. Results: In the study total 300 patients were included. No significant difference between both the groups in case of postoperative vomiting with p-value of 0.6028 (i.e. p > 0.05) and abdominal distension with p-value of 0.5183 (i.e. p > 0.05). Significant difference seen in the appearance of the bowel sound in post-operative period with p-value of 0.0002 (i.e. p < 0.05) and passage of flatus or stool with p-value of <0.0001. In case of early decompression group mean postoperative day for the suture removal was 11.9 days and for routine decompression group it was 12.3 days, the difference was statistically significant with p-value of 0.0006 (i.e. p < 0.05). The mean for the total hospital stay for early decompressed group was 10.04 days and for routine decompression group it was 10.47 days which was highly statically significant with p-value of 0.0001 (i.e. p < 0.05). Post-operative wound complication which was statically significance with p-value of 0.0394 (i.e. p < 0.05) and respiratory complications was also significant with pvalue of 0.0367 (i.e. p < 0.05). In case of early decompression post-operative nausea, vomiting and abdominal distention were higher but not significant statistically. Conclusions: Early removal of Ryle's tube leads to less incidence of respiratory complications and wound compli...