To examine any role of the high affinity Fcgamma class I receptor (FcgammaRI) (CD64) in erythrocyte elimination by mononuclear phagocytes (MP) in thalassaemia (thal), we investigated the in vitro interaction of beta-thalassaemic erythrocytes with monocytes (Mo) whose FcgammaR expression had been modulated by cytokines. Treatment of Mo with interferon (IFN)-gamma or interleukin (IL)-10 which up-regulate FcgammaRI, caused a dose-dependent increase in binding of beta-thalassaemic erythrocytes, whereas stimulation with IL-4 which down-regulates the receptor, reduced this interaction, in a dose-dependent manner, to that of normal erythrocytes. Binding of thalassaemic erythrocytes by IFN-gamma or IL-10-treated Mo was inhibited by FcgammaRI-specific reagents. In addition, Mo expression of FcgammaRI and HLA class II DR was determined by flow cytometry in Thai patients with HbH disease (alpha1/alpha2 or alpha1/Hb Constant Spring) (n = 15) or beta degrees -thal/HbE (n = 16). In both groups of patients FcgammaRI expression was increased as compared to normal controls (n = 14): mean fluorescence intensity (+/-SD) 124.79 +/- 38. 77 in HbH disease and 121.86 +/- 18.23 in beta degrees -thal/HbE versus 91.94 +/- 17.36 in normal controls (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). In contrast, HLA class II DR expression was similar in patients and controls. The results suggest that, in thalassaemia, up-regulated FcgammaRI on mononuclear phagocytes plays a role in their interaction with erythrocytes and that this process can be modified by cytokines.

No abstract

The cnstant advance ofmedical technology fuels ever increasing expectatis fOf the healthi srvice by the public. During much of the history of the

With the beginning of the twenty-first century only twelve years away, it is clearly not too early for dental educators to be planning for it. If one compares the practice of dentistry and the nature of dental education in 1888 with that of 1988, and then tries to project what they will be like in the year 2088, we have a difficult task indeed. As Alvin Toffler has pointed out in his book Future Shock, we are in an ever escalating period of change. Dentistry and dental education will change much more in the next one hundred years than they have in the last one hundred years.

No abstract