The article examines the phenomenology of polytemporality of political processes. This problem plays a key in methodological of chronopolitics. The author views the synchronizing of polytemporality of political processes as a tool for maintaining the stability and architectonical balance of institutional regimes. Particular attention is paid to the chronotope characteristic of a institutional regimes.

В статье рассматриваются особенности управления временем в условиях постфордизма. Трансформация управления временем связывается с размыванием разделения рабочего и свободного времени, изменением баланса между работой и семьей, защищенностью и самореализацией, господством и подчинением, производством и потреблением. Особое внимание уделяется причинам и последствиям перехода к самоконтролю работника за своим временем. В фордизме контроль за временем был направлен на систему взаимодействия человека и машины, что отразилось в идее конвейера. Затем контроль был обращен на людей и отношения между ними. На следующем этапе издержки контроля переносятся на самих работников или клиентов. Иерархический контроль за распределением времени заменяется контролем рыночного типа. Этот процесс сопровождается стиранием различий между качествами личности и свойствами рабочей силы. Автор приходит к выводу, что изменение структуры времени и подходов к управлению им отражают трансформацию не только управленческих парадигм, но и фундаментальных отношений в обществе.Ключевые слова: время, постфордизм, тайм-менеджмент, иерархия, сетевые структуры, самоконтроль, занятость. The article deals with the features of time management in the conditions of post-Fordism. The transformation of time management is associated with the erosion of the division of working and free time, a change in the balance between work and family, security and self-realization, domination and subordination, production and consumption. Particular attention is paid to the causes and consequences of the transition to self-control of an employee for his time. In Fordism, time control was aimed at the system of human-machine interaction, which was reflected in the idea of the conveyor. Then the control was turned to people and the relationship between them. At the next stage, control costs are transferred to the employees or customers themselves. Hierarchical control over the distribution of time is replaced by a market-type control. This process is accompanied by the erasure of the differences between the qualities of the individual and the properties of the workforce. The author comes to the conclusion that changing the structure of time and approaches to managing it reflects the transformation not only of administrative paradigms, but also of fundamental relations in society. TRANSFORMATION OF TIME MANAGEMENT IN THE CONDITIONS OF POST

The article considers the role of the phenomenology of time in substantiating the methodology of chronopolicy. In a phenomenological perspective, chronopolicy appears as a field of knowledge that primarily studies the question of how time determines the constructing of political worlds with their political reflection, political thinking and political action. The political reflection is based on the diverse forms of the political time experience, which determine the conditions for political action. In chronopolitical studies of the political worlds constructing, the fundamental importance is the distinction between the directly contemplated time and the discursively comprehended time. The problem of political subjectivity is considered in the context of the internal "temporal bias" arising because of contradictions between the practical, conscious and experienced forms of time. For example, such a "temporal shift" is manifested in the correlation of the political ideal and the actual political reality. It is the temporalization that helps to resolve the contradictions between the due and the existing in political thinking: the due and the existing are correlated, as a rule, in time. The diverse forms of experience of political time and the ability to manage it largely determine the differences in political reflection of different social strata, groups and communities. These differences are determined by the characteristic social rhythms and ways of giving sense to the past, present and future. The political prospects of the individual political actors depend to a certain extent on their dynamism and sense of time. The chronopolicy becomes more relevant in the conditions of modern culture, which is characterized by the multiplicity of temporality.

No abstract

Contemporary changes in historical culture associated with various states of modernity actualize the problem of the foundations and prerequisites of historicism as a principle of thinking characteristic of modern societies. The ancient historicism background consists primarily in the advanced concepts of time and eternity, which contain the potential variability in the understanding of historicity in modern philosophy and culture. At the same time, the problem of the historical variability of the world remained on the periphery of ancient philosophy and culture, and classical historicism, which was established in the second half of the 18th century, was based on the rejection of some aspects of the ancient heritage. In opposing being and becoming, ancient philosophy preferred being, which was also manifested in the preference for truth over time, for one over multiple. Classical historicism of modern times is focused on the idea of becoming, which in a new way reveals the contradictions between truth and time, one and multiple. Relativism and plurality are becoming features of modern transformations of historicism, in which the structures of time are preserved, dating back to the ancient concepts of chronos, kairos, eon, etc. Of particular interest are modern ideas about time, which go back to the ancient concept of objectified chronological time and its correlation with other forms of time conceptualization. In the historical consciousness of modern times, the ancient concepts of time were transformed under the influence of the prophetic sense of time, characteristic of the biblical tradition, in which the historical process is considered in the context of the gradual revelation of the original intention and meaning of history.