WB-MRI proved superior to PET/CT in detecting MM, especially in diffuse disease. PET/CT appears to be more sensitive in the assessment of MM after treatment.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has opened new possibilities to current diagnostic radiology in the evaluation of bone marrow. Compared with other imaging modalities, MRI is the only technique able to directly visualise bone marrow with its different components of red and yellow marrow. Other advantages of MRI are high-contrast resolution and multiplanar view, as well as extensive coverage of the skeleton with whole-body MRI (WBMRI). However, specificity of signal alterations of bone marrow is low. Therefore, MRI findings need to be integrated with clinical and laboratory findings as well as with haematological and oncological evaluation. MRI provides information that effectively aids diagnosis, staging and follow-up of various bone marrow disorders. There is increasing interest in the capabilities of MRI in the evaluation of bone marrow, in particular of haematological malignancies. According to some authors much work remains to be done to improve sensitivity and specificity of MRI in order to define the real clinical value of this imaging modality in the multidisciplinary management of patients with a haematological malignancy. This article presents recent developments and perspectives in the use of MRI in oncohaematological diseases.

The use of contrast media in modern image-guided medicine is essential. In cases in which the information contained in the information leaflet is modified and updated in any way whatsoever (indications, dosage, at others), specifically if restrictions are introduced in accordance with the law in force, the pharmaceutical industry must provide formal and timely notification to radiologists. On their part as prescribers and users of contrast media, radiologists must remain up to date regarding any changes in indications, dosage and route of administration. Lastly, we propose that the radiology report includes not only the type but also the dose of contrast medium used.

No abstract

The original version of this article, unfortunately, contained a mistake. The name of the last author should have been A. Rotundo instead of A. Rotondo. Nella versione originale di questo articolo era contenuto un refuso accidentale. Il nome dell'ultimo autore avrebbe dovuto essere A. Rotundo anziché A. Rotondo.The online version of the original article can be found at http://dx