IntroductionGeneral practice in Australia, as in many countries, faces challenges in the areas of workforce capacity and workforce distribution. General practice vocational training in Australia not only addresses the training of competent independent general practitioners (GPs) but also addresses these workforce issues. This study aims to establish the prevalence and associations of early career (within 2 years of completion of vocational training) GPs’ practice characteristics; and also to establish their perceptions of utility of their training in preparing them for independent practice.Methods and analysisThis will be a cross-sectional questionnaire study. Participants will be former registrars (‘alumni’) of three regional training organisations (RTOs) who achieved general practice Fellowship (qualifying them for independent practice) between January 2016 and July 2018 inclusive. The questionnaire data will be linked to data collected as part of the participants’ educational programme with the RTOs. Outcomes will include alumni rurality of practice; socioeconomic status of practice; retention within their RTO’s geographic footprint; workload; provision of nursing home care, after-hours care and home visits; and involvement in general practice teaching and supervision. Associations of these outcomes will be established with logistic regression. The utility of RTO-provided training versus in-practice training in preparing the early career GP for unsupervised post-Ffellowship practice in particular aspects of practice will be assessed with χ2 tests.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is by the University of Newcastle Human Research Ethics Committee, approval numbers H-2018-0333 and H-2009-0323. The findings of this study will be widely disseminated via conference presentations and publication in peer-reviewed journals, educational practice translational workshops and the GP Synergy Research subwebsite.

Background During vocational general practice training, the content of each trainee’s (in Australia, registrars’) in-consultation clinical experience is expected to entail a breadth of conditions that exemplify general practice, enabling registrars to gain competency in managing common clinical conditions and common clinical scenarios. Prior to the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) project there was little research into the content of registrars’ consultations despite its importance to quality of training. ReCEnT aims to document the consultation-based clinical and educational experiences of individual Australian registrars. Methods ReCEnT is an inception cohort study. It is comprised of closely interrelated research and educational components. Registrars are recruited by participating general practice regional training organisations. They provide demographic information about themselves, their skills, and their previous training. In each of three 6-month long general practice training terms they provide data about the practice where they work and collect data from 60 consecutive patient encounters using an online portal. Analysis of data uses standard techniques including linear and logistic regression modelling. The ReCEnT project has approval from the University of Newcastle Human Research Ethics Committee, Reference H-2009–0323. Discussion Strengths of the study are the granular detail of clinical practice relating to patient demographics, presenting problems/diagnoses, medication decisions, investigations requested, referrals made, procedures undertaken, follow-up arranged, learning goals generated, and in-consultation help sought; the linking of the above variables to the presenting problems/diagnoses to which they pertain; and a very high response rate. The study is limited by not having information regarding severity of illness, medical history of the patient, full medication regimens, or patient compliance to clinical decisions made at the consultation. Data is analysed using standard techniques to answer research questions that can be categorised as: mapping analyses of clinical exposure; exploratory analyses of associations of clinical exposure; mapping and exploratory analyses of educational actions; mapping and exploratory analyses of other outcomes; longitudinal ‘within-registrar’ analyses; longitudinal ‘within-program’ analyses; testing efficacy of educational interventions; and analyses of ReCEnT data together with data from other sources. The study enables identification of training needs and translation of subsequent evidence-based educational innovations into specialist training of general practitioners.

No abstract

PRIMARY HEALTHCARE, in Australia principally via general practice, is the main determinant of effective and equitable healthcare for the entire population. 1 Planning for an adequate general practitioner (GP) workforce remains a challenging balancing act between demand and supply. 2 Australian general practice continues to evolve in a changing political and social context, in which GPs are dealing with an ageing population with more chronic conditions and, at the same time, juggling their work and life responsibilities. 3 Although many GPs are satisfied with their job, 4,5 these demographic and societal changes are affecting their participation in clinical practice. The average number of clinical hours worked by GPs has decreased in recent years, 6 with the trend evident across career stages and genders. 7,8 Although female GPs work, on average, fewer hours than male GPs, 8 male GPs have also been reducing their clinical working hours. 9 Many GPs are also diversifying their career structure to include other non-clinical GP-related activities, such as medical education, research and other professional interests. 10,11 The shift to flexibility in workload and conditions is evident in Australia and internationally. 5,[11][12][13] This flexibility is often associated with the desire to work fewer clinical hours in order to achieve a better work-life balance. 5,14 Although evidence from Canada suggests that recent early-career GPs are not working less than later career cohorts, 15 many GPs in training do not see themselves working full time in clinical practice. [16][17][18][19] Yet, little is known about GPs' clinical practice once they have completed their training and have made the transition to independent practice. An earlier study of early-career GPs looked at up to five years post-Fellowship, 20 but there remains a gap in knowledge of the immediate post-Fellowship period. Addressing this gap is important because the early patterns in general practice can establish future intentions, 13,19 and thus inform planning for GP workforce capacity and distribution. 3 The aim of this study was to establish the prevalence of early-career GPs working full time in clinical practice and the characteristics associated with early-career GPs working full time.

Introduction Patient encounter tools provide feedback and potentially reflection on general practitioner (GP) registrars’ in-practice learning and may contribute to the formative assessment of clinical competencies. However, little is known about the perceived utility of such tools. Aim To investigate the perceived utility of a patient encounter tool by GP registrars, their supervisors, and medical educators (MEs). Methods General practice registrars, supervisors and MEs from two Australian regional training organisations completed a cross-sectional questionnaire. Registrars rated how Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT), a patient encounter tool, influenced their reflection on, and change in, clinical practice, learning and training. Supervisors’ and MEs’ perceptions provided contextual information about understanding their registrars’ clinical practice, learning and training needs. Results Questionnaires were completed by 48% of registrars (n = 90), 22% of supervisors (n = 182), and 61% of MEs (n = 62). Most registrars agreed that ReCEnT helped them reflect on their clinical practice (79%), learning needs (69%) and training needs (72%). Many registrars reported changing their clinical practice (54%) and learning approaches (51%). Fewer (37%) agreed that ReCEnT influenced them to change their training plans. Most supervisors (68%) and MEs (82%) agreed ReCEnT reports helped them better understand their registrars’ clinical practice. Similarly, most supervisors (63%) and MEs (68%) agreed ReCEnT reports helped them better understand their registrars’ learning and training needs. Discussion ReCEnT can prompt self-reflection among registrars, leading to changes in clinical practice, learning approaches and training plans. Reaching its potential as an assessment for learning (as opposed to an assessment of learning) requires effective engagement between registrars, their supervisors and MEs.