No abstract

Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, in anticipation of a demand surge for high-care hospital beds, many hospitals postponed non-emergency interventions of cardiac patients. Aim The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of cardiac patients whose non-emergency interventions had been deferred during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Patients whose non-emergency cardiac intervention had been cancelled between March 19th and April 30th, 2020 were included (study group). All patients were considered as deferrable according to current recommendations. Patients’ outcomes after 12 months were compared to a seasonal control group who underwent non-emergency interventions in 2019 as scheduled. The primary endpoint was a composite of emergency cardiovascular hospitalization and death. Secondary endpoints were levels of symptoms and cardiac biomarkers. Results Outcomes of 193 consecutive patients in the study group were assessed and compared to 216 controls. The primary endpoint occurred significantly more often in the study group (HR 2.42, 95%CI 1.63–3.61, p < 0.001). This was driven by an increase in hospitalizations. Subgroup analyses showed that especially patients with a deferred transcatheter heart valve intervention experienced early emergency hospitalization (HR 9.55, 95%CI 3.70–24.62, p < 0.001). These findings were accompanied by more pronounced symptoms and higher biomarker levels. Conclusions Deferral of non-emergency cardiac interventions to meet the higher demand for hospital beds during the COVID-19 crisis is associated with early emergency cardiovascular hospitalizations. Patients suffering from valvular heart disease especially constitute a vulnerable group. Consequently, our results suggest that current recommendations on the management of cardiovascular disease during the COVID-19 pandemic need revision. Graphical abstract

Objectives The aim of the study was to analyze the impact of concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) assessed by the SYNTAX score (SS) and periprocedural percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Background Due to controversial data regarding the effect of CAD on outcomes after TAVR, proper revascularization strategies remain a matter of debate. Methods 553 patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR were included in this study. SS was calculated for each patient at baseline and after PCI. Primary outcome was one-year all-cause mortality. Results 60.2% of patients (N = 333) exhibited CAD with a mean SS of 10.8 ± 8.8. Of those, 120 patients (36.0%) received periprocedural PCI. In the treatment group, mean SS was decreased from 14.9 ± 9.1 to 6.3 ± 6.7. Patients with concomitant CAD suffered more frequently from myocardial infarction (MI) post TAVR compared to those without CAD (2.1% vs. 0.0%; P < 0.01). In the CAD cohort, MI rates were comparable between patients with and without PCI (2.2% vs. 2.5%; P = 0.71). Regarding SS, patients with a residual SS < 8 showed significant lower rates of one-year mortality (9.0% vs. 18.2%; P = 0.016) and MACCE (16.5% vs. 32.2%; P = 0.001). Besides left bundle brunch, predictors for an increased one-year mortality were a residual SS ≥ 8 in the CAD group (OR = 3.17; P = 0.011) and a EuroSCORE ≥ 4% in the entire study population (OR = 2.18; P = 0.017). Conclusion Our results suggest that a residual SS-guided revascularization strategy may improve prognosis after TAVR in patients with concomitant CAD. PCI aiming for a residual SS < 8 was associated with improved one-year clinical outcomes.

Background: Diabetes mellitus worsens outcomes in patients suffering from heart disease undergoing cardiac procedures. Objectives: To investigate the impact of diabetes in patients undergoing mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER). Methods: 1118 patients treated with M-TEER for functional (FMR) and degenerative (DMR) mitral regurgitation (MR) between 2010 and 2021 were analyzed using the combined endpoint of death/rehospitalization for heart failure (HFH). Results: Among diabetics (N = 306; 27.4%), comorbidities such as coronary artery disease (75.2% vs. 62.7%; p < 0.001) and progressed (stage III/IV) chronic kidney disease (79.5% vs. 72.6%; p = 0.018) were more frequent. The rate of FMR was higher in diabetics (71.9% vs. 64.5%; p < 0.001). The combined endpoint occurred more frequently in diabetics (40.2% vs. 35.6%; log-rank = 0.035). While no difference was observed in FMR patients (36.8% vs. 37.6%; log-rank p = 0.710), rates of the combined endpoint differed significantly between diabetics and non-diabetics in DMR patients (48.8% vs. 31.9%; log-rank p = 0.001) only. However, diabetes did neither predict the combined endpoint in the overall (OR: 0.97; 95% CI 0.65–1.45; p = 0.890) nor in the DMR cohort (OR: 0.73; 95% CI 0.35–1.51; p = 0.389). Among diabetics treated with M-TEER, troponin (OR: 2.32; 95% CI 1.3–3.7; p = 0.002) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR: 0.52; 95% CI 0.3–0.88; p = 0.018) independently predicted the combined endpoint. Conclusions: Diabetes is associated with adverse outcomes after M-TEER, particularly in DMR patients. However, diabetes does not predict the combined endpoint. In diabetics undergoing M-TEER, biochemical markers associated with organ function and damage independently predict the combined endpoint of death and rehospitalization.