No abstract

Disseminated adenovirus infections cause significant mortality in stem cell transplanted patients and are suspected to originate from asymptomatic adenovirus persistence ("latency") in lymphocytes. The infection of three human T-lymphocyte lines (Jurkat, PM1, and CEM) with human adenovirus types of species A (HAdV-A31), B (HAdV-B3, -B11), and C (HAdV-C2, -C5) was investigated for 150 days in order to establish in vitro models for adenovirus persistence. HAdV-C5 persisted with continuous production of infectious virus progeny (about 10(7) TCID50 /ml) in PM1 cells. More than 100 copies of HAdV-C5-DNA per cell were detected by real-time PCR but hexon immunostaining showed that only 7.5% of the cells were infected ("carrier state infection"). Coxsackie and adenovirus receptor (CAR) expression was decreased in comparison to mock infected cultures suggesting selection of a semi-permissive subpopulation of PM-1 cells. By contrast, latency of HAdV-DNA (10(-3) -10(-4)  copies/cell) without production of infectious virus progeny was observed in HAdV-C2 infection of PM1 and Jurkat, HAdV-A31 infection of PM1, and HAdV-B3 infection of Jurkat cells. In addition, transcription of E1A, DNA polymerase and hexon mRNA was not detected by RT-PCR suggesting an equivalent of clinical "HAdV latency." Persistence of HAdV-DNA was not observed in abortive infections of PM1 cells with HAdV-B3 and -B11 and in productive, lytical infections of Jurkat cells with HAdV-C5, HAdV-B11, and HAdV-A31. In conclusion, lytic and persistent infections with and without production of infectious virus were observed depending on the type of adenovirus. Genetic determinants for viral persistence may be investigated using these newly established infection models.

No abstract

Preemptive and therapeutic donor lymphocyte infusions (preDLI and tDLI) are widely used in relapsing and relapsed hematopoietic malignancies after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) to enhance the graft-versus-malignancy effect. However, in advanced myeloid malignancies, long-term survival after preDLI and tDLI remains low, reflecting our inability to master the double-edged sword of alloreactivity, balancing anti-neoplastic activity versus graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). We previously evaluated a quantitative PCR-based high-sensitivity chimerism (hs-chimerism) based on insertion/deletion polymorphisms instead of short tandem repeats, where increasing host chimerism in peripheral blood predicts relapse more than a month before clinical diagnosis, and declining host chimerism signals anti-host alloreactivity. Here we report 32 consecutive patients with advanced myeloid malignancies receiving preDLI or tDLI “navigated” by hs-chimerism (“navigated DLI”). We compared them to a historical cohort of 110 consecutive preDLI or tDLI recipients, prior to implementation of hs-chimerism at our institution (“controls”). Both groups were comparable regarding age, gender, conditioning, donor type, and time to DLI. With longer median follow-up of the navigated DLI group (8.5 versus 5 months), their landmark overall (64%) and disease-free survival (62%) at 2 years from first DLI compared favorably with controls (23% and 21%, respectively). Improved survival of navigated DLI was due to both reduced relapse incidence (38% versus 60%) and non-relapse mortality (17% versus 44%) at 2 years. Early relapse prediction by hs-chimerism allowed a preemptive approach in 28% of navigated DLI versus 7% in controls. Our results confirm hs-chimerism as a highly valuable tool for monitoring and steering immune interventions after alloSCT.

Introduction: The combination treatment of venetoclax (VEN) with both low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) and hypomethylating agents (HMA) in untreated primarily elderly AML patients yielded promising response rates leading to its approval for newly diagnosed AML patients who are 75 years or older, or who have comorbidities that preclude use of intensive induction chemotherapy. Prolonged cytopenias are of potential concern in venetoclax treated patients, especially in patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) prior venetoclax treatment. Objective: To compare hematologic recovery in patients treated with VEN in combination with intensive and non-intensive chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) depending on the pretreatment status for alloHCT. Methods: In this retrospective controlled study (www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT03662724), we included patients aged 18 years or older with R/R acute leukemia previously treated with VEN (days 1-7) combined with intensive salvage chemotherapy (fludarabine, cytarabine, idarubicin - FLAVIDA) or VEN combined with non-intensive regimens, namely HMA or LDAC. Eighty-one patients who were treated with FLA-IDA for R/R AML served as control for the intensively treated patients included in this analysis. Responses were evaluated per revised International Working Group criteria for AML. Main outcome measure was the rate of objective response (complete remission [CR] + CR with incomplete blood count recovery [CRi] + partial remission [PR] + morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS; defined as less than 5% blasts in an aspirate sample). Safety and efficacy analyses included all patients who received at least one cycle of VEN combination treatment. This study was approved by the local Ethics Review Committee in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Results: Between January 2017 and May 2019 49 patients with a median age of 59 years (range 18-80) received VEN with either FLA-IDA (n=14), HMA (n=31) or LDAC (n=4) and had safety and efficacy outcomes reported. The patient cohort was a high-risk cohort of relapsed (n=24) and refractory (n=25) patients. The analysis included 24 patients (49%) with secondary AML and two patients with biphenotypic acute leukemia (BAL). Twenty-two patients (45%) had received prior alloHCT and 7 (14%) had relapsed <12 months after transplantation. Twelve patients (25%) had complex cytogenetics and 42 (86%) had intermediate or poor risk AML according to ELN 2017 criteria. The ORR in the 35 non-intensively treated patients was 57% (n=20) with 17 complete responses (49%, CR/CRis), 2 MLFS, and one PR. One patient died before first assessment. Response rates were similar in patients with and without prior alloHCT (ORR 56% vs. 58%). In non-intensively treated responding patients the median time to neutrophil (≥1.0x109/L) and platelet recovery (≥100x109/L) was 42 and 41 days, respectively. No differences in recovery times were observed between patients with and without prior alloHCT (39 vs. 46 days for neutrophil recovery; 41 vs. 52 days for platelet recovery (Fig.1A-B)). For intensively treated patients the ORR was 79% (n=11) with 9 CR/CRis (64%), one MLFS, and one PR compared to an ORR of 47% in the FLA-IDA control cohort. Median time to neutrophil (≥1.0x109/L) and platelet recovery (≥100x109/L) in intensively treated responding patients were 34 and 36 days compared to 39 and 41 days in the control cohort. Median recovery times in patients with and without prior alloHCT were similar (FLAVIDA: 34 vs. 33 days for neutrophil recovery; 36 vs. 36 days for platelet recovery, Fig. 1 C-D; FLA-IDA control: 41 vs. 38 days for neutrophil recovery; 70 vs. 38 days for platelet recovery, Fig. 1 E-F). After a median follow-up of 10.5 months the median overall survival (OS) was 8 months in non-intensively treated patients. After a median follow-up of 9.9 months the median OS was not reached in intensively treated patients. Median event-free survival was 5.8 months in non-intensively treated patients and was not reached in intensively treated patients. Conclusions: Venetoclax in combination with intensive chemotherapy as well as non-intensive regimens showed promising response rates for treatment of relapsed or refractory AML with good tolerability and acceptable duration of cytopenias with no differences in recovery times in patients with and without prior alloHCT. Disclosures Koenecke: Novartis: Other: none. Heuser:Bayer Pharma AG, Berlin: Research Funding; Synimmune: Research Funding.