On the basis of theoretical calculations of electron diffusion coefficients and of OGO 5 data, Lyons [1974] suggested that electrostatic electron cyclotron harmonic waves had amplitudes large enough to cause the strong pitch angle diffusion of plasma sheet keV electrons and to be responsible for diffuse auroral precipitation. However, recent measurements of the wave location and amplitude performed aboard the GEOS spacecraft have brought new pieces of information challenging these conclusions. Our calculations are based on the theoretical tool developed by Lyons [1974] but take into account the recently observed wave confinement within a few degrees from the magnetic equator. Under these conditions, we avoid the numerical averaging of the pitch angle diffusion coefficient over the whole line of force, and we can derive an analytical expression of the minimum wave amplitude required to cause strong pitch angle diffusion for plasma sheet electrons. This expression has the advantage to be easily tractable in further calculations, and permits us to evaluate the dependence of the results on parameters that are not reported by observations, such as the wave number spectrum. Our results are found to differ from Lyons's [1974] predictions by a factor of about 2.5, and typically, a wave amplitude of more than 2 mV m−1 is required to put 1‐keV electrons on strong diffusion. On the other hand, on the basis of a statistical analysis of electron cyclotron wave amplitudes measured in the nightside plasmasheet by the GEOS 2 spacecraft, we show that most of the time (>91 %), this typical value of 2 mV m−1 is not reached. This result appears inconsistent with the hypothesis that diffuse auroras, which are a permanent feature of the auroral zones, are due solely to electrostatic electron cyclotron waves. This leads us to the conclusion that these waves are not the only cause of diffuse electron precipitation. It is suggested that other mechanisms involving for instance the dynamics of the ions (such as field‐aligned currents) could play an important role.
We present a statistical study of interplanetary conditions and geospace response to 89 coronal mass ejection-driven sheaths observed during Solar Cycles 23 and 24. We investigate in particular the dependencies on the driver properties and variations across the sheath. We find that the ejecta speed principally controls the sheath geoeffectiveness and shows the highest correlations with sheath parameters, in particular in the region closest to the shock. Sheaths of fast ejecta have on average high solar wind speeds, magnetic (B) field magnitudes, and fluctuations, and they generate efficiently strong out-of-ecliptic fields. Slow-ejecta sheaths are considerably slower and have weaker fields and field fluctuations, and therefore they cause primarily moderate geospace activity. Sheaths of weak and strong B field ejecta have distinct properties, but differences in their geoeffectiveness are less drastic. Sheaths of fast and strong ejecta push the subsolar magnetopause significantly earthward, often even beyond geostationary orbit. Slow-ejecta sheaths also compress the magnetopause significantly due to their large densities that are likely a result of their relatively long propagation times and source near the streamer belt. We find the regions near the shock and ejecta leading edge to be the most geoeffective parts of the sheath. These regions are also associated with the largest B field magnitudes, out-of-ecliptic fields, and field fluctuations as well as largest speeds and densities. The variations, however, depend on driver properties. Forecasting sheath properties is challenging due to their variable nature, but the dependence on ejecta properties determined in this work could help to estimate sheath geoeffectiveness through remote-sensing coronal mass ejection observations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.