Borst, W. M. 1990. Physiological changes in asparagus spear tips after harvest. -Physiol. Plant. 80: 393-400.To extend our understanding of the physiology of asparagus after harvest, changes in respiration rate, protein and amino add complement, and ultrastructure of tip sections (0-30 mm) of asparagus spears (Asparagus officinalis L. cv. Limbras 10) were investigated. Spears had been stored for up to 4 days in the d,ark at 20°C. Respiration rate (carbon dioxide efflux) declined rapidly after harvest before stabilizing at 12 h at ca 50% of the rate at harvest. Protein, amino acid, and ammonium content of tip sections of 180 mm spears (intact tip sections) during storage, and comparable sections excised from spears at harvest and subsequently stored (excised tip sections), were compared. Total protein content of intact and excised tip sections increased ca 10% 6-12 h after harvest, and then declined to ca 85% of harvest levels at 48 h. Gel electrophoresis in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulphate revealed the net loss of specific proteins at 48 h. Free amino acid content of excised tip sections declined to ca 75% of harvest levels 12 h after harvest, and then increased to 150% of harvest levels by 48 h. Glutamine levels declined rapidly after harvest, and asparagine content increased ca 200% at 24 h. Similar trends in free amino acid content were found in sections of intact tips. Ammonia (ammonium ions) accumulated to ca 0.3% dry weight at 48 h in both intact and excised tip sections. Ultrastructural studies revealed that tonoplast breakdown commenced 48-96 h after harvest. Results are discussed in relation to the sequence of physiological events following harvest and the timing of mechanisms responsible for their initiation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.