The results of a prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter clinical trial that compared endovascular stent graft exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysms with open surgical repair are presented. During an 18-month period, 250 patients with infrarenal aneurysms underwent treatment at 12 study sites-190 patients underwent endovascular repair using the Medtronic AneuRx stent graft (Sunnyvale, Calif), and 60 underwent open surgical repair. There was no significant difference in operative mortality rates between the groups. The patients who underwent stent grafting had significant reductions in blood loss, time to extubation, and days in the intensive care unit and in the hospital, with an earlier return to function. The major morbidity rate was reduced from 23% in the surgery group to 12% (P <. 05) in the stent graft group. There was no difference in the combined morbidity/mortality rates between the two groups. Primary technical success at the time of discharge for the patients with stent grafts was 77%, largely as a result of a 21% endoleak rate. At 1 month, the endoleak rate had decreased to 9%. There was no difference in the primary or secondary procedure success rates at 30 days between the surgery and stent graft groups. The primary graft patency rate at 6 months was 98% in the surgery group and 97% in the stent graft group. The aneurysm exclusion rate at 1 month and 6 months was 100% in patients who underwent surgery and 91% in patients who underwent stent grafting. Stent graft migration occurred in three patients and resulted in late endoleaks; each endoleak was corrected by means of endovascular placement of a stent graft extender cuff. There have been no aneurysm ruptures and no surgical conversions to open repair in the stent graft group. Stent graft repair compares favorably with open surgical repair, with a reduced morbidity rate, shortened hospital stays, and satisfactory short term outcomes.
The presence or absence of endoleak on CT scan before hospital discharge does not appear to predict patient survival or aneurysm rupture rate after endovascular aneurysm repair using the AneuRx stent graft. Although the identification of blood flow in the aneurysm sac after endovascular repair is a meaningful finding and may at times indicate inadequate stent graft fixation, the usefulness of endoleak as a primary indicator of procedural success or failure is unclear. Therefore, all patients who have undergone endovascular aneurysm repair should be carefully followed up regardless of endoleak status.
Palmaz balloon-expandable stents were placed in 28 hypertensive patients with atherosclerosis involving the ostia of the renal arteries. Stents were placed to treat elastic recoil immediately after conventional angioplasty in 20 patients and restenosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in eight patients. Technical success (greater than 30% residual stenosis) was achieved in 27 patients. Complications occurred in five patients. At follow-up (1-25 months), hypertension was cured in three patients and improved in 15 patients, with a cumulative cure or improvement of 64% at 6 months. Of 14 patients with a serum creatinine level of 1.5 mg/dL (132.6 mumol/L) or greater before the placement of stents, five demonstrated improved renal function, five showed stabilization of their condition, and four demonstrated deterioration. Follow-up angiography (2-18 months) was performed in 18 patients. Restenosis was present in seven patients and was accompanied by a relapse of hypertension in only three patients. Of the other four patients with restenosis, two had no initial improvement and two had an initial response without a relapse of hypertension. In this preliminary study, renal stents were beneficial in many patients with poor results from conventional angioplasty for ostial atheroma.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.