Using data from national surveys done prior to the past eight U.S. presidential elections by the Survey Research Center/Center for Political Studies of the University of Michigan, the relation between preference and expectation was analyzed. In each year, people tended to expect their preferred candidate to win by a ratio of about 4:1. This relationship was diminished, though it was still significant, in the years in which the outcome was relatively unambiguous. The relationship was strongest among people who were highly involved but poorly informed. Derivations from balance theory received considerable support. Analyses of two sets of panel data indicated that preferences are more stable than are expectations, and people are more likely to alter or bend their expectations to coincide with their preferences than vice versa. The discussion focused on the generality of the observed relationship, alternative explanations of the phenomenon, and the relation of the present study to the priority and dominance of affect and cognition.Previous research has dealt with social psychological consequences of a failure in prophecy (Festinger, Riecken, & Schachter, 1956;Hardyck & Braden, 1962). Our focus is on a prior step in the process, namely, the formation of a prophecy and how this prophecy is related to a person's preference. Relying on election survey data, we observe and examine the relationship between people's preferences

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract