A critical review of the literature on family therapy ethics is used to develop the proposition that a more systemic analysis is needed, one that includes the levels of therapist and society as well as patient (family). These ideas are discussed through reexamining the issues of family secrets, therapist deceptiveness, and therapist advocacy of personal (feminist) values.

This paper offers a model for high quality training in family therapy. The unique aspects of the Family Consortium's model are that it: (a) is aimed at practicing professionals; (b) emphasizes structural family therapy principles with strategic and experiential elements; (c) is geared secondarily toward training members as effective peer consultants and trainers; and (d) uses an awareness of the isomorphic nature of training, therapy and family transactions. Part I describes the practical organization structure of the Consortium. Part I1 discusses the current theoretical philosophy and training approach of this evolving group. Examples aregiven of how the Consortium has dealt with specific training issues.

An earlier paper (Wendorf, 1984) presented the pragmatic aspects and theoretical model of The Family Therapy Consortium, a group set up to provide supervision and continuing education in family therapy. The emphasis was on the development of each individual therapist's competency, the isomorphic relationship between the supervisor, group, therapist, and family levels of the therapeutic system, and the legitimacy of the term “peer supervision.” Beginning under the leadership of an expert supervisor hired from outside the group, the Family Therapy Consortium has developed into a peer supervision group with a “floating,” rather than fixed, supervisory hierarchy. The present paper charts this development and explores the peer supervision process as it currently works in the Consortium. The focus is on the growth of the individual behind the mirror as therapist, person, leader and group member, and on the growth of the group as a “mature sibling subsystem” no longer in need of outside supervision. Individual and group development are seen as complementary aspects of the same growth process.

No abstract

Rachel Hare-Mustin (1980) concluded in her recent article that family therapy "may not be in the best interests of individual family members" (p. 935). In particular, she claims that the "required" involvement of individuals may deny them their rights, the "typical" working toward a goal of becoming the traditional ideal family may be sexist or stereotyping, and individuals may be "at risk" when individual needs conflict with the whole. This article will reply to Dr. Hare-Mustin's concerns by offering a brief review of the known empirical evidence on these issues.