No abstract

BackgroundThe positive effects of human bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells (hBM-MSCs) and minocycline on ischemic stroke models have been well described through numerous studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of combination therapy of hBM-MSCs with minocycline in a middle cerebral artery occlusion rat model.MethodsForty male Sprague-Dawley rats were enrolled in this study. After right middle cerebral artery occlusion, rats were randomly assigned to one of four groups: control, minocycline, hBM-MSCs, or hBM-MSCs with minocycline. Rotarod test, adhesive-removal test, and modified neurological severity score grading were performed before and 1, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after right middle cerebral artery occlusion. All rats were sacrificed at day 28. The volume of the infarcted area was measured with triphenyl tetrazolium chloride staining. Neuronal nuclear antigen (NeuN)- and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-positive cells in the ischemic boundary zone were assessed by immunofluorescence.ResultsNeurological outcome in the adhesive-removal test and rotarod test and modified neurological severity score were better in the combination therapy group than in the monotherapy and control groups. The volume of the infarcted area was smaller in the combination group compared with the others. The proportions of NeuN- and VEGF-positive cells in the ischemic boundary were highest in the combination therapy group.ConclusionsEarly combination therapy of hBM-MSCs with minocycline in an ischemic stroke model may enhance neurological recovery, reduce the volume of the infarcted area, and promote the expression of NeuN and VEGF in ischemic boundary cells.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s13287-018-1011-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

ObjectiveTo investigate the sagittal sacropelvic morphology and balance of the patients with SIJ pain following lumbar fusion.MethodsAmong 452 patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion between June 2009 and January 2013, patients with postoperative SIJ pain, being responded to SIJ block were enrolled. For a control group, patients matched for sex, age group, the number of fused level and fusion to sacrum were randomly selected. Patients were assessed radiologic parameters including lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT) and sacral slope (SS). To evaluate the sagittal sacropelvic morphology and balance, the ratio of PT/PI, SS/PI and PT/SS were analyzed.ResultsA total of 28 patients with SIJ pain and 56 patients without SIJ pain were assessed. Postoperatively, SIJ pain group showed significantly greater PT (p=0.02) than non-SIJ pain group. Postoperatively, PT/PI and SS/PI in SIJ pain group was significantly greater and smaller than those in non-SIJ pain group respectively (p=0.03, 0.02, respectively) except for PT/SS (p=0.05). SIJ pain group did not show significant postoperative changes of PT/PI and SS/PI (p=0.09 and 0.08, respectively) while non-SIJ pain group showed significantly decrease of PT/PI (p=0.00) and increase of SS/PI (p=0.00).ConclusionThis study presents different sagittal sacropelvic morphology and balance between the patients with/without SIJ pain following lumbar fusion surgery. The patients with SIJ pain showed retroversed pelvis and vertical sacrum while the patients without SIJ pain have similar morphologic features with asymptomatic populations in the literature.