The mechanical damage and failure of cement sheaths in gas storage wells under cyclic loading have been studied extensively. However, because the test device cannot restore the wellbore condition, most studies have been theoretical or regular experimental. If the load‐bearing mode and stress environment in a test device differ from those in a wellbore, then the damage and failure modes will deviate from what occurs in the actual wellbore. Therefore, it is necessary to explore a method that restores the wellbore condition and design a wellbore simulation device that reveals the deformation and damage of the cement sheath. In this study, the development laws of microannulus and microcracks in the cement sheath were studied by triaxial cyclic loading, low‐field nuclear magnetic resonance imaging, and scanning electron microscopy. A device to evaluate cement sheath integrity was then developed. A stress equivalence method was proposed, based on the principle that the stresses at the first and second interfaces of the device are equal to those of the wellbore cement sheath. This method was used to design material, size, and experimental conditions to simulate the load‐deformation law of a cement sheath in a gas storage well. The damage failure mechanism was investigated using the simulation results and computed tomography. Micropores and microcracks in the cement sheath increased continuously under cyclic loading. Damage accumulated, causing strength failure as the period of the cyclic loading increased. Plastic deformation of the cement sheath occurred under cyclic loading, but interfacial peeling did not. The reason is that the cement sheath is under compressive stress during loading and unloading, and the interface between the cement sheath and the outer wall is not damaged. This study provides a new method for studying the mechanical failure of a cement sheath under complex wellbore conditions.
During their life cycle, high-pressure gas wells experience circulating working fluid, acid fracturing, blow off, and other development and production conditions. This may lead to the failure of the cement sheath integrity and result in sustained casing pressure (SCP). Therefore, we explored the failure types and mechanisms of the cement sheath using different wellbore operating procedures. In this study, we used the downhole packer as the demarcation point; the integrity of the cement sheath at the upper and lower parts of the packer was tested through a self-developed wellbore simulation device, which is based on the equivalent theory of cement sheath interface differential pressure. Results showed that the lower part of the single-layer cement sheath underwent compressive strength failure due to the pressure drop in the wellbore before perforation. Plastic deformation of the cement sheath occurred during acid fracturing.In addition, the cooling effect caused by the acid fracturing led to the bonding failure at the cement sheath's second interface. The double-layer cement sheath's inner-layer cement sheath was subjected to tensile failure -attributed to highpressure -and the outer-layer cement sheath maintained its integrity under the pressure changes. Considering the risk factors associated with integrity failure, we propose an engineering optimization plan in the study. The retest results showed that reducing the internal casing pressure and temperature and controlling the annular pressure in the production stage was beneficial in ensuring the integrity of the cement sheath at the lower and upper parts of the packer, respectively. The research results provided an important reference for ensuring the integrity of the cement sheath of high-pressure gas wells.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.