Conjugated
polymers with a donor–acceptor (DA) structural
motif have found extensive use in a wide variety of optoelectronic
devices; however, despite their ubiquity in the literature, the vast
majority of these materials are simple alternating copolymersone
electron donor alternates with one electron acceptor in the polymer
backbone. As a result, the impact of composition (e.g., donor/acceptor
ratio) and structure (e.g., alternating, block, or random) on the
optoelectronic properties of these copolymers remains poorly understood.
In this work, the number of acceptor units in alternating DA copolymers
is systematically increased. Two dimers of the common electron acceptor
isoindigo are synthesized, one with free rotation between the subunits
and one with enforced coplanarity. The two dimers are then used to
synthesize donor–acceptor–acceptor (DAA) copolymers
with either thiophene or terthiophene comonomers. These DAA polymers
feature two electron acceptors in their repeat unit, and their optoelectronic
properties are compared to those of the analogous DA polymers. It
is shown that increasing the number of acceptor units causes a decrease
in the LUMO energy of the resulting polymer; this effect is enhanced
by enforcing coplanarity between acceptor units via ring fusion. All
six polymers were tested in both organic photovoltaics (OPVs) and
organic thin film transistors (OTFTs). While the DA polymers performed
better in OPVs, the DAA polymers displayed more balanced charge carrier
mobilities in OTFTs.
A novel small bandgap donor–acceptor polymer with a very small band gap of 0.95 eV shows promising photoresponse under near infrared light in phototransistors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.