Flowering transition is tightly coordinated by complex gene regulatory networks, in which AGAMOUS-LIKE 16 (AGL16) plays important roles. Here, we identified the molecular function and binding properties of AGL16 and demonstrated its partial dependency on SUPPRESSOR OF CONSTANS 1 (SOC1) function in regulating flowering. AGL16 bound to promoters of more than 2000 genes via CArG-box motifs with high similarity to that of SOC1 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Approximately seventy flowering genes involved in multiple pathways were potential targets of AGL16. AGL16 formed a protein complex with SOC1 and shared a common set of targets. Intriguingly, only a limited number of genes were differentially expressed in the agl16-1 loss-of-function mutant. However, in the soc1-2 knockout background, AGL16 repressed and activated the expression of 375 and 182 genes, respectively, with more than a quarter bound by AGL16. Corroborating these findings, AGL16 repressed the flowering time more strongly in soc1-2 than in the Col-0 background. These data identify a partial inter-dependency between AGL16 and SOC1 in regulating genome-wide gene expression and flowering time, while AGL16 provides a feedback regulation on SOC1 expression. Our study sheds light on the complex background dependency of AGL16 in flowering regulation, thus providing additional insights into the molecular coordination of development and environmental adaptation.

Flowering transition is pivotal and tightly regulated by complex gene-regulatory-networks, in which AGL16 plays important roles. But the molecular function and binding property of AGL16 is not fully explored in vivo. With ChIP-seq and comparative transcriptomics approaches, we characterized the AGL16 targets spectrum and tested its close molecular and genetic interactions with SOC1, the key flowering integrator. AGL16 bound to promoters of more than 2000 genes via CArG-box motifs that were highly similar to that of SOC1. Being consistent with this, AGL16 formed protein complex and shared a common set of targets with SOC1. However, only very few genes showed differential expression in the agl16-1 loss-of-function mutant, whereas in the soc1-2 knockout background, AGL16 repressed and activated the expression of 375 and 182 genes, respectively, with more than a quarter of the DEGs were also bound by AGL16. AGL16 targeted potentially to about seventy flowering time genes involved in multiple pathways. Corroborating with these, AGL16 repressed the flowering time stronger in soc1-2 than in Col-0 background. These data reveals that AGL16 regulates gene expression and flowering time with a partial dependency on SOC1 activity. Moreover, AGL16 participated in the regulation of water loss and seed dormancy. Our study thus defines the AGL16 molecular spectrum and provides insights underlining the molecular coordination of flowering and environmental adaptation.