Microcystic meningioma (MM) is a rare subtype of intracranial meningiomas, with clinical and radiologic features not well characterized in the literature. Based on our experience, we propose a classification system of intracranial MMs. We reviewed the medical records, radiographic studies, and operative notes of a group of consecutive patients with intracranial MM. The mean age of the 69 patients was 46.8 ± 10.6 years (range, 21-75 years). Three types of intracranial MMs could be identified. Type 1 MMs presented as a solid lesion, hypointense or isointense on T1WI, hyperintense on T2WI, and homogeneous or heterogeneous enhancement, and were found in 43 patients (67.2%). Type 2 MMs represented signals similar to CSF both on T1WI and T2WI, and faint reticular enhancement with marginal enhancement, and these were found in 7 patients (10.9%). Type 3 MMs consisted of cystic-solid or cystic lesion and were found in 14 patients (21.9%). Significant differences were observed among the different types of MMs for the following variables: sex, presence of severe peritumoral brain edema (PTBE), and extent of tumor resection. Females were found in all of patients with type 2 MMs, but were only 35.7% of those with type 3 MMs (P = 0.018). Severe PTBEs were more common among patients with type 1 MMs (55.8%) than among those with type 2 (14.3%) and type 3 MMs (14.3%) (P = 0.007). Type 1 MMs (97.7%) were associated with a significantly higher rate of gross total resection compared with the other two types (71.4 and 78.6%) (P = 0.019). Total length of hospital stay after craniotomy ranged from 4 to 30 days (median, 8 days). There were no significant differences in progression-free survival among the three types of MMs (P = 0.788). The current classification identifies three distinct types of intracranial MM based on their radiological findings and growth patterns. The type 1 MMs are more commonly associated with severe PTBE. Type 2 and Type 3 MMs have a higher predilection towards parasaggital location with venous involvement and therefore have a lower rate of gross total resection.
Objective: To evaluate the risk factors of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) undergoing radical radiotherapy (with or without concurrent chemotherapy) and to assess the prognostic value of tumor volume regression (TVR) based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in different risk groups. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 176 individuals diagnosed with stage IIA-IVA cervical cancer (CC) who underwent radical intensity-modulated radiotherapy in our center between January 2012 and December 2020. The tumor volume before radiotherapy (TVp) and before brachytherapy (TVmid) were evaluated based on three-dimensional MRI images, TVR = (TVp -TVmid)/TVp×100%. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess patient’s overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Prognostic factors were identified using Cox proportional hazards models. Results: For the entire cohort, patients with TVR ≥ 94% had better 5-year OS (82.7% vs 49.8%, p<0.001) and 5-year PFS (82.5% vs 51.1%, p<0.001) compared to TVR < 94%. Patients with TVR ≥ 94% were more likely to receive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) than those with TVR < 94% (70.1% vs 40.5%, p<0.05). Among patients undergoing CCRT, those with a TVR ≥ 94% had a better prognosis than those with a TVR < 94%. However, among patients who received RT alone, those with TVR ≥ 94% had better PFS but no statistically significant difference in OS. Likewise, among patients with CYFRA21-1 < 7.7 ng/ml, patients with TVR ≥ 94% had a better prognosis. However, TVR was not a prognostic factor in patients with CYFRA21-1 ≥ 7.7 ng/ml. Both CYFRA21-1 (OS, PFS interaction, p<0.001) and FIGO stage (PFS interaction, p=0.035) were found to significantly impact predictive effects of TVR. Conclusion: In LACC patients with CRYFA21-1 < 7.7 ng/ml who received CCRT, TVR was an important prognostic factor. However, in patients with CRYFA21-1 ≥7.7 ng/ml who received RT alone, the prognostic value of TVR needs to be further explored.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.