This series agrees with the current published work in finding that patients undergoing major lower limb amputation are older, with a high prevalence of comorbid conditions. Successful prosthesis rehabilitation depends on patient selection and a multidisciplinary approach. Despite a low immediate mortality, the overall long-term results of lower limb amputation remain dismal.

A prospective randomised controlled trial of two paired wound-swabbing techniques (Levine versus Z) was conducted to establish which method was more effective in determining the presence of bacteria in clinically infected wounds. The Levine technique involves rotating the wound swab over a 1-cm(2) area of the wound; the Z technique involves rotating the swab between the fingers in a zigzag fashion across the wound without touching the wound edge. Fifty patients were recruited into the study with acute (42%) and chronic wounds (58%). Overall, the Levine technique detected significantly more organisms than the Z technique (P≤ 0· 001). When acute and chronic wounds were analysed separately, the Levine technique again detected more organisms in both acute (P≤ 0· 001) and chronic wounds (P≤ 0· 001). We conclude that the Levine technique is superior to the Z technique and this result may be because of the Levine technique's ability to express fluid from the wound bed and thereby sampling a greater concentration of microorganisms from both the surface and slightly below the surface of the wound.

Wound infection is a major challenge for clinicians globally, with accurate and timely identification of wound infection being critical to achieving clinical and cost-effective management, and promotion of healing. This paper presents an overview of the development of the International Wound Infection Institute (IWII)'s 2022 Wound Infection in Clinical Practice consensus document. The updated document summarises current evidence and provides multidisciplinary healthcare providers with effective guidance and support on terminology, paradigms related to biofilm, identification of wound infection, wound cleansing, debridement and antimicrobial stewardship. Integral to the update is revision of wound infection management strategies which are incorporated within the IWII's Wound Infection Continuum (IWII–WIC) and management plan. The aim of the 2022 IWII consensus document update was to provide an accessible and useful clinical resource in at least six languages, incorporating the latest evidence and current best practice for wound infection and prevention. Dissemination techniques for the consensus are discussed and highlighted.

Executive summary Purpose This document aims to provide wound care clinicians with a rapid and structured overview of the key issues related to use of eHealth applications (telemedicine and telehealth) within wound care. This includes: An overview of terminology and available literature Guidance on the methodology for evaluation of eHealth solutions An introduction to and discussion of the potential benefits of eHealth technologies in wound care, and the possible barriers to their implementation Recommendations for ensuring a good implementation process and supporting involvement of wound care professionals in safeguarding that eHealth solutions meet the needs of the patients. Methodology The document sections lean on the structure and focus areas of the Model for ASsessment of Telemedicine (MAST) which defines crucial items to evaluate an eHealth application. The content of the document is developed on the basis of a literature review, identifying available documentation for use of eHealth solutions in wound care. Furthermore, it draws on various key documents recently published on the general development, evaluation and implementation of eHealth solutions. These include valuable up-to-date information relevant for any group of clinicians wishing to follow and influence the way eHealth solutions are integrated into clinical practice. Findings and conclusions The literature review revealed that the amount and level of evidence for use of eHealth applications in wound care is still limited. Some MAST domains are not examined in any of the available studies. Thus, more research is required to identify the potential benefits and harms to patients, and the possible challenges related to implementation of eHealth solutions in wound care. Potential barriers and facilitators for the implementation of eHealth applications into wound care practice are identified in the document, and these may all either enhance or impede the process. However, the available research does demonstrate patient satisfaction, improved access to health services for all client cohorts, and increased job satisfaction for clinicians. The document recommends that wound management clinicians, considering the use of eHealth applications in their clinical practice, consult widely and conduct regular evaluation of the outcomes to ensure efficient implementation of these services. To support this approach, steps to ensure a good implementation process within a given organisation have been proposed. These are synthesised into a three circle model.

The microbiological profile of chronic leg ulcers has application to general treatment principles as well in guiding the necessity and choice of antibiotic therapy. Concordance between swab and biopsy results was poor; we recommend biopsy in the tertiary setting.