. (2015). Developmental differences in the ability to provide temporal information associated with an instance of a repeated event. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29,[407][408][409][410][411][412][413][414][415][416][417] We are grateful to the children, parents and schools who participated, and to the numerous TEMPORAL MEMORY OF A REPEATED EVENT 3 AbstractChildren (n = 372) aged 4 -8 years participated in 1 or 4 occurrences of a similar event and were interviewed 1 week later. Compared to 85% of children who participated once, less than 25% with repeated experience gave the exact number of times they participated, although all knew they participated more than once. Children with repeated experience were asked additional temporal questions and there were clear developmental differences. Older children were more able than younger children to judge relative order and temporal position of the four occurrences.They also demonstrated improved temporal memory for the first and last relative to the middle occurrences, while younger children did so only for the first. This is the first systematic demonstration of children's memory for temporal information after a repeated event. We discuss implications for theories of temporal memory development and the practical implications of asking children to provide temporal information.

When children allege repeated abuse, they are required to provide details about specific instances. This often results in children confusing details from different instances and so we examined whether 'mental context reinstatement' (MCR) could be used to improve children's accuracy. Children (N = 120, 6-7-year olds) participated in 4 activities over a 2-week period and were interviewed about the last (4 th ) time with a standard recall or mental context reinstatement interview. They were then asked questions about specific details, and some questions contained false information. When interviewed again a day later, children in the MCR condition resisted false suggestions that were consistent with the event more than false suggestions that were inconsistent; in contrast, children in the standard interview condition were equally suggestible for both false detail types and showed a 'yes bias'. The results suggest a practical way of eliciting more accurate information from child witnesses.

No abstract