Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have been successfully used in patients with heart failure. However, LVADs may trigger immune activation, leading to higher frequencies of autoantibodies.We describe the clinical, epidemiological, and laboratory characteristics of LVAD recipients with false

Background In this prospective study we evaluate the sampling performance of HPV16 DNA E6 and L1 levels in detecting anal intraepithelial neoplasm using either a moistened Dacron swab (DS) or cytobrush (CB). Methods: We recruited HIV-infected (n = 57) and organ-transplanted subjects (n = 3) with an abnormal anal Pap smear who presented for high-resolution anoscopy (HRA). Prior to HRA, the first 30 subjects underwent sampling with a moistened DS, and the next 30 with a CB. HRA was then performed in the usual fashion. Samples were tested for HPV16 DNA E6 and L1 DNA using a validated qPCR technique. Anal biopsies were taken as per standard-of-care and categorised as negative, AIN 1/warts, or AIN 2 or 3. Results: 59 of 60 samples had adequate DNA and were evaluated for the comparison of HPV16 E6 and L1 DNA levels. A CB performed better than the DS in detecting low positive and positive levels of HPV16 E6 DNA (P = 0.01). We then further evaluated the correlation of HRA-directed biopsies and HPV16 DNA E6 levels. There was a positive correlation of HRA-directed biopsy results stratified by increasing histological levels with HPV16 E6 DNA (P = 0.018, Kruskal–Wallis test). Conclusions: A CB performed better than DS for molecular HPV testing. If molecular testing is included in anal cancer screening, consideration should be made for co-sampling with both a DS for cytology and CB for HPV testing. Further studies evaluating the sample yields should be performed to assist in implementation of anal cancer screening programs in defined populations of at-risk individuals.