BackgroundThere remains an urgent need for a prophylactic HIV vaccine to control generalised epidemics. PrEP has demonstrated effectiveness of 86% and is recommended by WHO; uptake is generally high, but retention is disappointing in some settings. The EDCTP2 project PrEPVacc will assess the efficacy of two combination prophylactic vaccine regimens (DNA, MVA and Env protein/adjuvant) each compared to placebo and the proportion of infections averted by F/TAF in comparison to TDF/FTC. A Registration Cohort, recruiting HIV negative volunteers at risk of HIV will precede the trial.MethodsThe PrEPVacc partnership agreed that 70% vaccine efficacy had public health relevance. The trial uses nstage software for multi-arm, multi-stage designs (MAMS) and the averted infections ratio (AIR) methodology with participants randomised (i) 1:1:1 to active product or placebo (ii) 1:1 to TDF/FTC : F/TAF until week 26 (presumed peak immunogenicity). Access to PrEP in the Registration Cohort and after week 26 will be standard of care. HIV seroconversions occurring between weeks 0–26 will inform the PrEP analysis, incorporating HIV incidence amongst those who do not take up PrEP locally in the Registration Cohort. Seroconversions after week 26 will inform vaccine analyses.ResultsUp to 556 participants per group affords 92% power to detect vaccine efficacy of 70% at the final analysis, assuming incidence of 4/100-person years and 10% loss with 81% and 97% power to conclude that F/TAF can avert half or more of the infections prevented by TDF/FTC if effectiveness of TDF/FTC is 70% and 80%, respectively.ConclusionPrEPVacc adopts a pragmatic approach to uncertainties around HIV incidence in settings where PrEP is increasingly available. This innovative adaptive trial design uses validated software to determine vaccine efficacy and a novel methodology to evaluate a new PrEP agent, overcoming the challenge of demonstrating non-inferiority when adherence to TDF/FTC is high and the number of outcome events very low.

Background PrEP literacy is influenced by many factors including the types of information available and how it is interpreted. The level of PrEP literacy may influence acceptability and uptake. Methods We conducted 25 in-depth interviews in a HIV vaccine trial preparedness cohort study. We explored what participants knew about PrEP, sources of PrEP knowledge and how much they know about PrEP. We used the framework approach to generate themes for analysis guided by the Social Ecological Model and examined levels of PrEP literacy using the individual and interpersonal constructs of the SEM. Results We found that PrEP awareness is strongly influenced by external factors such as social media and how much participants know about HIV treatment and prevention in the local community. However, while participants highlighted the importance of the internet/social media as a source of information about PrEP they talked of low PrEP literacy in their communities. Participants indicated that their own knowledge came as a result of joining the HIV vaccine trial preparedness study. However, some expressed doubts about the effectiveness of the drug and worried about side effects. Participants commented that at the community level PrEP was associated with being sexually active, because it was used to prevent the sexual transmission of HIV. As a result, some participants commented that one could feel judged by the health workers for asking for PrEP at health facilities in the community. Conclusion The information collected in this study provided an understanding of the different layers of influence around individuals that are important to address to improve PrEP acceptability and uptake. Our findings can inform strategies to address the barriers to PrEP uptake, particularly at structural and community levels. Trial registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04066881

IntroductionTanzania is adapting a shortened injectable-free multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) regimen, comprising new drugs such as bedaquiline and delamanid and repurposed drugs such as clofazimine and linezolid. The regimen is implemented using a pragmatic prospective cohort study within the National TB and Leprosy Programme and is accompanied by a process evaluation. The process evaluation aims to unpack the implementation processes, their outcomes and the moderating factors in order to understand the clinical effectiveness of the regimen. This protocol describes the methods employed in understanding the implementation processes of the new MDR-TB regimen in 15 regions of Tanzania.MethodsThis study adopts a concurrent mixed-methods design. Using multiple data collection tools, we capture information on: implementation outcomes, stakeholder response to the intervention and the influence of contextual factors. Data will be collected from the 22 health facilities categorised as dispensaries, health centres, district hospitals and referral hospitals. Health workers (n=132) and patients (n=220) will fill a structured questionnaire. For each category of health facility, we will conduct five focus group discussions and in-depth interviews (n=45) for health workers. Participant observations (n=9) and review documents (n=22) will be conducted using structured checklists. Data will be collected at two points over a period of 1 year. We will analyse quantitative data using descriptive and inferential statistical methods. Thematic analysis will be used for qualitative data.Ethics and disseminationThis study received ethical approval from National Institute of Medical research (NIMR), Ref. NIMR/HQ/R.8a/Vol.IX/3269 and from the Mbeya Medical Research and Ethics Review Committee, Ref. SZEC-2439/R.A/V.I/38. Our findings are expected to inform the wider implementation of the new MDR-TB regimen as it is rolled out countrywide. Dissemination of findings will be through publications, conferences, workshops and implementation manuals for scaling up MDR-TB treatments.