Klebsiella pneumoniae is an important opportunistic healthcare-associated pathogen and major contributor to the global spread of antimicrobial resistance. Gastrointestinal colonization with K. pneumoniae is a major predisposing risk factor for infection and forms an important hub for the dispersal of resistance. Current culture-based detection methods are time consuming, give limited intra-sample abundance and strain diversity information, and have uncertain sensitivity. Here we investigated the presence and abundance of K. pneumoniae at the species and strain level within fecal samples from 103 community-based adults by qPCR and whole metagenomic sequencing (WMS) compared to culture-based detection. qPCR demonstrated the highest sensitivity, detecting K. pneumoniae in 61.2% and 75.8% of direct-fecal and culture-enriched sweep samples, respectively, including 52/52 culture-positive samples. WMS displayed lower sensitivity, detecting K. pneumoniae in 71.2% of culture-positive fecal samples at a 0.01% abundance cutoff, and was inclined to false positives in proportion to the relative abundance of other Enterobacterales present. qPCR accurately quantified K. pneumoniae to 16 genome copies/reaction while WMS could estimate relative abundance to at least 0.01%. Quantification by both methods correlated strongly with each other (Spearman’s rho = 0.91). WMS also supported accurate intra-sample K. pneumoniae sequence type (ST)-level diversity detection from fecal microbiomes to 0.1% relative abundance, agreeing with the culture-based detected ST in 16/19 samples. Our results show that qPCR and WMS are sensitive and reliable tools for detection, quantification, and strain analysis of K. pneumoniae from fecal samples with potential to support infection control and enhance insights in K. pneumoniae gastrointestinal ecology.

BackgroundAn ancestral trait of eukaryotic cells is the presence of mitochondria as an essential element for function and survival. Proper functioning of mitochondria depends on the import of nearly all proteins that is performed by complexes located in both mitochondrial membranes. The complexes have been proposed to contain subunits formed by proteins common to all eukaryotes and additional subunits regarded as lineage specific. Since Amoebozoa is poorly sampled for the complexes we investigated the outer membrane complexes, namely TOM, TOB/SAM and ERMES complexes, using available genome and transcriptome sequences, including transcriptomes assembled by us.ResultsThe results indicate differences in the organization of the Amoebozoa TOM, TOB/SAM and ERMES complexes, with the TOM complex appearing to be the most diverse. This is reflected by differences in the number of involved subunits and in similarities to the cognate proteins of representatives from different supergroups of eukaryotes.ConclusionsThe obtained results clearly demonstrate structural variability/diversity of these complexes in the Amoebozoa lineage and the reduction of their complexity as compared with the same complexes of model organisms.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-016-2402-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Protein import into mitochondria requires a wide variety of proteins, forming complexes in both mitochondrial membranes. The TOM complex (translocase of the outer membrane) is responsible for decoding of targeting signals, translocation of imported proteins across or into the outer membrane, and their subsequent sorting. Thus the TOM complex is regarded as the main gate into mitochondria for imported proteins. Available data indicate that mitochondria of representative organisms from across the major phylogenetic lineages of eukaryotes differ in subunit organization of the TOM complex. The subunit organization of the TOM complex in the Amoebozoa is still elusive, so we decided to investigate its organization in the soil amoeba Acanthamoeba castellanii and the slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum. They represent two major subclades of the Amoebozoa: the Lobosa and Conosa, respectively. Our results confirm the presence of Tom70, Tom40 and Tom7 in the A. castellanii and D. discoideum TOM complex, while the presence of Tom22 and Tom20 is less supported. Interestingly, the Tom proteins display the highest similarity to Opisthokonta cognate proteins, with the exception of Tom40. Thus representatives of two major subclades of the Amoebozoa appear to be similar in organization of the TOM complex, despite differences in their lifestyle.