Background and ObjectiveApproximately 5–40 % of patients treated with clopidogrel do not display an adequate antiplatelet response. Clopidogrel resistance may be caused by insufficient drug absorption or impaired metabolic activation of the drug. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of clopidogrel and its metabolites in plasma samples from patients treated with high and low doses of clopidogrel, to obtain a possible explanation for antiplatelet resistance.MethodsThe study included patients receiving either a single 300 mg loading dose of clopidogrel (n = 17) or a 75 mg dose (n = 45) for at least 7 days before sample collection. The concentrations of clopidogrel and its metabolites—the inactive H3 and the pharmacologically active H4 isomers of the thiol metabolite and the inactive carboxylic acid metabolite—in plasma samples (stabilized with 2-bromo-3′-methoxyacetophenone) from three patients after 300 mg and from 41 patients after 75 mg of the drug were determined using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method with tandem mass spectrometry. The non-stabilized samples from the remaining patients were analysed using a validated capillary electrophoresis method. The calculated concentrations were used to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of the analytes. The pharmacodynamic response to clopidogrel treatment, expressed as adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation, was measured using a Multiplate analyser.ResultsThe pharmacokinetic parameter values for the H3 and H4 isomers determined in the studied group of patients treated with clopidogrel 75 mg (maximum plasma concentration [Cmax] 5.29 ± 5.54 and 7.13 ± 6.32 ng/mL for H3 and H4, respectively; area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to time t [AUCt] 7.37 ± 6.71 and 11.30 ± 9.58 ng·h/mL for H3 and H4, respectively) were lower than those reported in healthy volunteers, according to the literature data. Platelet aggregation measured with a Multiplate analyser ranged between 37 and 747 AU·min. A significant correlation was found between the Cmax of the active H4 isomer and platelet aggregation (p = 0.025).ConclusionThe Cmax of the active H4 isomer and platelet aggregation measured by the Multiplate analyser may serve as markers of the patient response to clopidogrel therapy.

No abstract

The introduction of ticagrelor, one of the first directly-acting oral antiplatelet drugs, provided new possibilities in the prevention of thrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Current guidelines recommend ticagrelor in dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin over clopidogrel for prevention of stent thrombosis in patients with ACS. Moreover, in the management of ACS, lipid-lowering treatment with high-intensity statin therapy is advised for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events over the long term. Despite the apparent advantages of combined antiplatelet and lipid-lowering treatments, a possible interaction between statins and ticagrelor may lead to myopathy and rhabdomyolysis. In this review, relevant information was gathered on the ticagrelor-statin interaction that might lead to this life-threatening condition. This review focuses on the most widely used statins—simvastatin, atorvastatin, and rosuvastatin. Possible mechanisms of this interaction are discussed, including CYP3A4 isoenzymes, organic anion transporter polypeptide (OATPs), P-glycoprotein and glucuronidation. PubMed database was searched for relevant case reports and all data gathered from the introduction of ticagrelor to March 2018 are presented and discussed. In summary, co-administration of statins and ticagrelor was found to be relatively safe in routinely prescribed doses. However, caution should be exercised, especially in elder populations.

PurposeThere is an increasing interest in use of treosulfan (TREO), a structural analogue of busulfan, as an agent in conditioning regimens prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), both in pediatric and adult populations. The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model and to establish limited sampling strategies (LSSs) enabling accurate estimation of exposure to this drug.MethodsThe study included 15 pediatric patients with malignant and non-malignant diseases, undergoing conditioning regimens prior to HSCT including TREO administered as a 1 h or 2 h infusion at daily doses of 10, 12, or 14 g/m2. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed by means of non-linear mixed-effect modeling approach in Monolix® software. Multivariate regression analysis and Bayesian method were used to develop 2- and 3-point strategies for estimation of exposure to TREO.ResultsPharmacokinetics of TREO was best described with a two-compartmental linear model with proportional residual error. Following sampling schedules allowed accurate estimation of exposure to TREO: 1 h and 6 h or 1 h, 2 h, and 6 h for a TREO dose 12 g/m2 in a 1 h infusion, or at 2 h and 6 h or 2 h, 4 h, and 8 h for a TREO dose of 12 g/m2 and 14 g/m2 in a 2 h infusion.ConclusionsA two-compartmental population pharmacokinetic model of TREO was developed and successfully used to establish 2- and 3-point LSSs for accurate and precise estimation of TREO AUC0→∞.