Formation equilibria of Zn(ii) and Cu(ii) complexes of antimicrobial calcitermin and its mutants are studied; impressive MIC breakpoints are obtained.

BackgroundThe food-borne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes is the causative agent of listeriosis. The β-lactam antibiotics penicillin G and ampicillin are the current drugs of choice for the treatment of listerial infections. While isolates of L. monocytogenes are susceptible to these antibiotics, their action is only bacteriostatic and consequently, this bacterium is regarded as tolerant to β-lactams. In addition, L. monocytogenes has a high level of innate resistance to the cephalosporin family of β-lactams frequently used to treat sepsis of unknown etiology. Given the high mortality rate of listeriosis despite rational antibiotic therapy, it is important to identify genes that play a role in the susceptibility and tolerance of L. monocytogenes to β-lactams.ResultsThe hly-based promoter trap system was applied to identify penicillin G-inducible genes of L. monocytogenes. The results of reporter system studies, verified by transcriptional analysis, identified ten penicillin G-inducible genes. The contribution of three of these genes, encoding a ferritin-like protein (fri), a two-component phosphate-response regulator (phoP) and an AraC/XylS family transcriptional regulator (axyR), to the susceptibility and tolerance of L. monocytogenes to β-lactams was examined by analysis of nonpolar deletion mutants. The absence of PhoP or AxyR resulted in more rapid growth of the strains in the presence of sublethal concentration of β-lactams, but had no effect on the MIC values or the ability to survive a lethal dose of these antibiotics. However, the Δfri strain showed impaired growth in the presence of sublethal concentrations of penicillin G and ampicillin and a significantly reduced ability to survive lethal concentrations of these β-lactams. A lack of Fri also caused a 2-fold increase in the sensitivity of L. monocytogenes to cefalotin and cephradine.ConclusionsThe present study has identified Fri as an important mediator of β-lactam tolerance and innate resistance to cephalosporins in L. monocytogenes. PhoP and AxyR are probably involved in transmitting signals to adjust the rate of growth of L. monocytogenes under β-lactam pressure, but these regulators do not play a significant role in susceptibility and tolerance to this class of antibiotics.

Many prey animals experience temporal variation in the risk of predation and therefore face the problem of allocating their time between antipredator efforts and other activities like feeding and breeding. We investigated time allocation of prey animals that balanced predation risk and feeding opportunities. The predation risk allocation hypothesis predicts that animals should forage more in low- than in high-risk situations and that this difference should increase with an increasing attack ratio (i.e. difference between low- and high-risk situations) and proportion of time spent at high risk. To test these predictions we conducted a field test using bank voles ( Clethrionomys glareolus) as a prey and the least weasel ( Mustela nivalis nivalis) as a predator. The temporal pattern and intensity of predation risk were manipulated in large outdoor enclosures and the foraging effort and patch use of voles were measured by recording giving-up densities. We did not observe any variation in feeding effort due to changes in the level of risk or the proportion of time spent under high-risk conditions. The only significant effect was found when the attack ratio was altered: the foraging effort of voles was higher in the treatment with a low attack ratio than in the treatment with a high attack ratio. Thus the results did not support the predation risk allocation hypothesis and we question the applicability of the hypothesis to our study system. We argue that the deviation between the observed pattern of feeding behaviour of bank voles and that predicted by the predation risk allocation hypothesis was mostly due to the inability of voles to accurately assess the changes in the level of risk. However, we also emphasise the difficulties of testing hypotheses under outdoor conditions and with mammals capable of flexible behavioural patterns.

No abstract