No abstract

EUVL requires the use of reflective optics including a reflective mask. The mask consists of an absorber layer pattern on top of a reflecting multilayer, tuned for 13.53 nm. The EUVL mask is a complex optical element with many parameters contributing the final wafer image quality. Specifically, the oblique incidence of light, in combination with the small ratio of wavelength to mask topography, causes a number of effects which are unique to EUV, such as an HV CD offset. These so-called shadowing effects can be corrected by means of OPC, but also need to be considered in the mask stack design. In this paper we will present an overview of the mask contributors to imaging performance at the 27 nm node and below, such as CD uniformity, multilayer and absorber stack composition, thickness and reflectivity. We will consider basic OPC and resulting MEEF and contrast. These parameters will be reviewed in the context of real-life scanner parameters both for the NXE:3100 and NXE:3300 system configurations. The predictions will be compared to exposure results on NXE:3100 tools, with NA=0.25 for different masks. Using this comparison we will extrapolate the predictions to NXE:3300, with NA=0.33. Based on the lithographic investigation, expected requirements for EUV mask parameters will be proposed for 22 nm node EUV lithography, to provide guidance for mask manufacturers to support the introduction of EUV High Volume Manufacturing.

No abstract

No abstract

EUV lithography performance is improved significantly by optimizing and fine-tuning of the EUV mask. The EUV mask is an active element of the scanner optical system influencing main lithographic figure of merits such as image contrast, critical dimension uniformity (CDU), focus and overlay. The mask stack consists of Mo/Si multilayer acting as a bright field and a patterned absorber stack. In this work we will concentrate on investigation of EUV absorber.Absorber topography that is pronounced compared to the imaging wavelength of 13.5 nm, will give rise to various mask 3d effects such as shadowing or dependence of CD on feature orientation, best focus shift of different resolution structures, etc. [1] [2] . Light interference in the absorber layer results in swinging behavior of various lithography metrics as function of the absorber height [5] . Optimization of the mask absorber allows mitigating mask 3d effects and improving imaging performance. In particular, reduction of the absorber height mitigates the shadowing effect and relaxes requirements on Optical Proximity Correction (OPC), but can result in smaller Process Window due to lower imaging contrast and larger best focus shifts.In this work we will show results of an experimental approach to absorber height optimization. A special mask with 27 different absorber heights in the range 40-70 nm is manufactured by Toppan Photomasks. EUV reflectivity spectra are measured for the different absorber heights and an experimental swing curve is constructed.For each absorber height various resolution features are present on the mask. Lines of 27 nm and 22 nm are imaged on the wafer using the ASML EUV scanner NXE:3300B with an NA of 0.33. The experimental CD swing curve is constructed as well as HV change as a function of absorber height. The impact of the absorber height on Exposure Latitude (EL) and Dose to Size (D2S) is investigated. EL improves with increasing absorber height in some cases, however there is no clear EL gain for a 70 nm absorber compared to for example 52 nm absorber. D2S does show a clear trend through absorber height. In particular, D2S can be reduced by absorber height reduction: e.g. for 52 nm absorber D2S is 5% or 1 mJ/cm 2 smaller compared to 70 nm.The experimental results are used for calibration and verification of rigorous mask 3d simulations. This knowledge is crucial for accurate OPC of production masks and allows for accurate litho simulations of EUV user cases as a basis for lithography roadmaps towards High Volume Manufacturing and High NA EUV.EUV absorber behavior is determined by phase shifts Reflectivity Swing Curve X 8% k 6% 4% 2% awrmiim mm 55 6.5 75 85 9.5 10.5 Ab orbe heieht,A /2n Light retardation in the matter 4 phase shift Substrate: LTEM EUV mask n -refraction index of absorber 46, 53, 60, 67.5, 75, 82 (for n = 0.95) 180° phase shift between bright field and dark field: A h 67.5 (for n=0.95) 1. Figure 1 Two types of phase shifts in EUV mask: (a) Interference between reflection at the top of the absorber and from the multil...