BackgroundIntraoperative epicardial ultrasonography of coronary artery bypass graft anastomoses is a procedure used for anatomical quality assessment of peripheral anastomoses during coronary artery bypass grafting. However, it may be difficult to keep the ultrasound transducer in steady contact with the anastomoses on the beating heart without causing any deformation. Furthermore, we are not aware of any sterile ultrasound gel approved for application into the pericardial space.Case presentationWe report a method using a stabilizing connecting device for an ultrasound transducer to be used for visualization of coronary anastomoses without application of ultrasound gel during on-pump coronary bypass surgery.ConclusionUse of a stabilizing device and coagulated blood from the patient as an alternative for ultrasound gel facilitates peroperative ultrasonography of coronary anastomoses. The procedure provides surgeons with non-deformed echocardiographic longitudinal and transverse images of all parts of the anastomoses.Trial registrationThe patient participated in a still ongoing clinical feasibility study: Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02919124; Registered September 29, 2016.
Background: Widespread use of intraoperative epicardial ultrasonography (ECUS) for quality assessment of coronary artery bypass graft anastomoses during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has not occurred-presumably due to technological and practical challenges including the need to maintain stable and optimal acoustic contact between the ultrasound probe and the target without the risk of distorting the anastomosis. We investigated the feasibility of using a stabilizing device during ultrasound imaging of distal coronary bypass graft anastomoses in patients undergoing on-pump CABG. Imaging was performed in both the longitudinal and transverse planes. Methods: Single-centre, observational prospective feasibility study among 51 patients undergoing elective, isolated on-pump CABG. Ultrasonography of peripheral coronary bypass anastomoses was performed using a stabilizing device upon which the ultrasound transducer was connected. Transit-time flow measurement (TTFM) was also performed. Descriptive statistical tests were used. Results: Longitudinal and transverse images from the heel, middle and toe were obtained from 134 of 155 coronary anastomoses (86.5%). After the learning curve (15 patients), all six projections were obtained from 100 of 108 anastomoses scanned (93%). Failure to obtain images were typical due to a sequential curved graft with anastomoses that could not be contained in the straight cavity of the stabilizing device, echo artefacts from a Titanium clip located in the roof of the anastomoses, and challenges in interpreting the images during the learning curve. No complications were associated with the ECUS procedure. The combined ECUS and TTFM resulted in immediate revision of five peripheral anastomoses. Conclusions: Peroperative use of a stabilizing device during ultrasonography of coronary artery bypass anastomoses in on-pump surgery facilitates imaging and provides surgeons with non-deformed longitudinal and transverse images of all parts of the anastomoses in all coronary territories. Peroperative ECUS in addition to flow measurements has the potential to increase the likelihood of detecting technical errors in constructed anastomoses. Trial registration: The study was registered on September 29, 2016, ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02919124.
AimsTo investigate patients' psychological reactions to postponement of elective cardiac surgery, and whether postponement was associated with increased complications post‐operative and while waiting.DesignA single‐centre observational prospective cohort study.MethodsAll adult patients referred for elective cardiac surgery during the study period were considered for inclusion. Psychological data were collected using a survey distributed to patients prior to surgery and at 6 months post‐operative. Clinical data were obtained from patient records.ResultsA total of 83 postponed and 132 non‐postponed patients were included. Postponed patients displayed more avoidance behaviour, but only immediately before surgery. Postponed patients maintained their satisfaction with perceived social support, whereas non‐postponed patients became more dissatisfied over time. Waiting 0–14 days was associated with increased symptoms of depression before surgery compared to non‐postponed patients or those waiting more than 14 days. Surgical complications were the same in both groups. No patients experienced aggravation of their disease leading to urgent or emergent surgery while waiting for surgery. Hospital‐related reasons were the most common cause for postponement of surgery.ConclusionPostponement of selected patients is not associated with increased risk of psychological distress or complications related to the patient's disease.Reporting MethodStrengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE).Implications for Patient CarePre‐ and post‐psychological interventions may be relevant to consider in relation to elective cardiac surgery as it has been shown to positively affect outcome. Organisational/hospital‐related reasons are still very common causes for postponement of elective surgeries, and hospital administrations should focus upon eliminating/decreasing this.Public ContributionQuestionnaires filled by patients were used to understand an association between postponement of cardiac surgery and psychological distress.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.