There is a need for a hand-heating system that will keep the hands warm during cold exposure without hampering finger dexterity. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of torso heating on the vasodilative responses and comfort levels of cooled extremities during a 3-h exposure to -15 degreesC air. Subjects were insulated, but their upper extremities were left exposed to the cold ambient air. The effect of heating the torso [torso-heating test (THT)] on hand comfort was compared with a control condition in which no torso heating was applied, but Arctic mitts were worn [control test (CT)]. The results indicate that mean finger temperature, mean finger blood flow, mean toe temperature, mean body skin temperature, body thermal comfort, mean finger thermal comfort, and rate of body heat storage were all significantly (P < 0.05) higher on average (n = 6) during THT. Mean body heat flow was significantly (P < 0.05) lower during THT. There were no significant differences (P >/= 0.05) in rectal temperature between CT and THT. Mean unheated body skin temperature and mean unheated body heat flow (both of which did not include the torso area in the calculation of mean body skin temperature and mean body heat flow) were also calculated. There were no significant differences (P >/= 0.05) in mean unheated body skin temperature and mean unheated body heat flow between CT and THT. It is concluded that the application of heat to the torso can maintain finger and toe comfort for an extended period of time during cold exposure.

The purpose of the present experiment was to examine the relationship between rate of body heat storage (S), change in body heat content (DeltaH(b)), extremity temperatures, and finger dexterity. S, DeltaH(b), finger skin temperature (T(fing)), toe skin temperature, finger dexterity, and rectal temperature were measured during active torso heating while the subjects sat in a chair and were exposed to -25 degrees C air. S and DeltaH(b) were measured using partitional calorimetry, rather than thermometry, which was used in the majority of previous studies. Eight men were exposed to four conditions in which the clothing covering the body or the level of torso heating was modified. After 3 h, T(fing) was 34.9 +/- 0.4, 31.2 +/- 1.2, 18.3 +/- 3.1, and 12.1 +/- 0.5 degrees C for the four conditions, whereas finger dexterity decreased by 0, 0, 26, and 39%, respectively. In contrast to some past studies, extremity comfort can be maintained, despite S that is slightly negative. This study also found a direct linear relationship between DeltaH(b) and T(fing) and toe skin temperature at a negative DeltaH(b). In addition, DeltaH(b) was a better indicator of the relative changes in extremity temperatures and finger dexterity over time than S.

The primary purpose of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of two forms of hand heating and to discuss specific trends that relate finger dexterity performance to variables such as finger skin temperature (T(fing)), finger blood flow (Q(fing)), forearm skin temperature (T(fsk)), forearm muscle temperature (Tfmus), mean weighted body skin temperature (Tsk), and change in body heat content (DeltaH(b)). These variables along with rate of body heat storage, toe skin temperature, and change in rectal temperature were measured during direct and indirect hand heating. Direct hand heating involved the use of electrically heated gloves to keep the fingers warm (heated gloves condition), whereas indirect hand heating involved warming the fingers indirectly by actively heating the torso with an electrically heated vest (heated vest condition). Seven men (age 35.6 +/- 5.6 yr) were subjected to each method of hand heating while they sat in a chair for 3 h during exposure to -25 degrees C air. Q(fing) was significantly (P < 0.05) higher during the heated vest condition compared with the heated gloves condition (234 +/- 28 and 33 +/- 4 perfusion units, respectively), despite a similar T(fing) (which ranged between 28 and 35 degrees C during the 3-h exposure). Despite the difference in Q(fing), there was no significant difference in finger dexterity performance. Therefore, finger dexterity can be maintained with direct hand heating despite a low Q(fing). DeltaH(b), Tsk, and T(fmus) reached a low of -472 +/- 18 kJ, 28.5 +/- 0.3 degrees C, and 29.8 +/- 0.5 degrees C, respectively, during the heated gloves condition, but the values were not low enough to affect finger dexterity.

One purpose of this study was to characterize the facial skin temperature and cold-induced vasodilation (CIVD) response of 12 subjects (six males and six females) during exposure to cold wind (i.e., -10 to 10 degrees C; 2, 5, and 8 m/s wind speed). This study found that at each wind speed, facial skin temperature decreased as ambient temperature decreased. The percentage of subjects showing facial CIVD decreased significantly at an ambient temperature above -10 degrees C. A similar CIVD percentage was observed between 0 degrees C dry and 10 degrees C wet (face sprayed with fine water mist) at each wind speed. No CIVDs were observed during the 10 degrees C dry condition at any wind speed. The incidence of CIVD response was more uniform across facial sites when there was a greater cold stress (i.e., -10 degrees C and 8 m/s wind). Another objective of the study was to examine the effect of the thermal state of the body (as reflected by core temperature) on the facial skin temperature response during rest and exercise. This study found that nose skin temperature was significantly higher in exercising subjects with an elevated core temperature even though there was no significant difference in face skin temperature between the two conditions. Therefore, this finding suggests that acral regions of the face, such as the nose, are more sensitive to changes in the thermal state of the body, and hence will stay warmer relative to other parts of the face during exercise in the cold.

This study evaluated a zero-heat-flow (ZHF), non-invasive temperature probe for in- vivo measurement of resting muscle temperature for up to 2 cm below the skin surface. The ZHF probe works by preventing heat loss from the tissue below the probe by actively heating the tissue until no temperature gradient exists across the probe. The skin temperature under the probe is then used as an indicator of the muscle temperature below. Eight subjects sat for 130 min during exposure to 28 degrees C air. Vastus lateralis (lateral thigh) muscle temperature was measured non-invasively using a ZHF probe which covered an invasive multicouple probe (which measured tissue temperature 0.5 cm, 1 cm, 1.5 cm, and 2 cm below the skin) located 15 cm superior to the patella (T (covered)). T (covered) was evaluated against an uncovered control multicouple probe located 20 cm superior to the patella (T (uncovered)). Rectal temperature and lateral thigh skin temperature were also measured. Mean T (uncovered) (based on average temperatures at the 0.5 cm, 1 cm, 1.5 cm, and 2 cm depths) and Mean T (covered) were similar from time 0 min to 60 min. However, when the ZHF was turned on at 70 min, Mean T (covered) increased by 2.11 +/- 0.20 degrees C by 130 min, while T (uncovered) remained stable. The ZHF probe temperature was similar to T (covered) at 1 cm and after time 85 min, significantly higher than T (covered) at the 0.5 cm, 1.5 cm, and 2 cm depths; however from a physiological standpoint, the temperatures between the different depths and the ZHF probe could be considered uniform (< or =0.2 degrees C separation). Rectal and thigh skin temperatures were stable at 36.99 +/- 0.08 degrees C and 32.82 +/- 0.23 degrees C, respectively. In conclusion, the non-invasive ZHF probe temperature was similar to the T (covered) temperatures directly measured up to 2 cm beneath the surface of the thigh, but all T (covered) temperatures were not representative of the true muscle temperature up to 2 cm below the skin because the ZHF probe heated the muscle by 2.11 +/- 0.20 degrees C during its operation.