Purpose: To determine whether reporting neuropathic pain (NP) at an average of 5 years after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was related to patient age, sex, preoperative comorbidity, arthritis self-efficacy, or disability before surgery and at 1 year after surgery. The estimate of NP prevalence and cross-sectional group differences were explored at 5 years after surgery. Methods: A subsample of participants in a formal research study was contacted via mail approximately 5 years after undergoing surgery and were sent four questionnaires: the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, the Patient Health Questionnaire, the Self-Administered Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Signs and Symptoms (S–LANSS), and a satisfaction questionnaire. NP was defined as an S-LANSS score of 12 or more. Results: Of 89 patients who met the inclusion criteria, data for 63 (71%) patients (47 women; mean age 67 [SD 8] y) were used for analysis. Of these 63, 9 (14%) were identified as having NP. None had a report of failure of prosthesis or other surgical complications according to most recent medical records. There was no relationship between preoperative patient characteristics and development of NP. However, the NP group on average had a higher report of stiffness (p=0.020), physical dysfunction (p=0.019), and pain (p=0.050) at 1 year after surgery. Cross-sectional comparisons showed higher levels of pain (p=0.001), stiffness (p=0.008), physical dysfunction (p=0.003), and depression (p=0.005) and lower satisfaction (p=0.018) at the time of the survey than the patients without NP. Conclusion: The estimated prevalence of NP was 14%. Patients with NP reported higher levels of disability as early as 1 year after surgery. They remained more disabled, with a higher level of depression and less satisfaction, at an average of 5 years after surgery.

Background:Work-related rotator cuff injuries are a common cause of disability and employee time loss.Purpose:To examine the effectiveness of expedited rotator cuff surgery in injured workers who underwent rotator cuff decompression or repair and to explore the impact of demographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors in predicting the outcome of surgery.Study Design:Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:Injured workers who were seen at a shoulder specialty program and who underwent expedited arthroscopic rotator cuff decompression or repair were observed for a period of 6 to 12 months based on their type of surgery and recovery trajectory. The primary outcome measure was the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form. The impact of surgery was assessed by whether the change in the ASES score exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 17 points. Secondary outcomes were range of motion (ROM), medication consumption, and work status.Results:One hundred forty-six patients (43 women [29%], 103 men [71%]; mean age, 52 years; SD, 8 years) completed the study. Sixty-seven (46%) patients underwent rotator cuff repair. The mean time between the date the patient consented to have surgery and the date of surgery was 82 (SD, 44) days. There was a statistically significant improvement in ASES score and ROM and work status (52 returned to regular duties and 59 to modified duties) (P < .0001). Eighty-four percent (n = 122) of patients exceeded the MCID of 17 points. Individual factors that affected patient overall disability were preoperative ASES, work status prior to surgery, access to care, and autonomy at work. Achieving a minimal clinically meaningful change was influenced by perceived access to care, autonomy and stress at work, and overall satisfaction with the job.Conclusion:Expedited rotator cuff surgery improved disability, ROM, and work status in injured workers. Successful recovery after work-related shoulder injuries may further be facilitated by improving the psychosocial work environment and increasing access to care.

No abstract