We proposed "Foundress-Max" hypothesis that a bumble bee foundress chooses her nest site to maximize her energy intake rate from nectar. To examine the hypothesis, we estimated the maximum energy intake rate at each site in the study area, and compared the distribution of the maximum energy intake rates with those of actual nest sites. We also calculated rank correlations of the maximum energy intake rate with the number of nest-searching foundresses at 54 sites. The nest locations supported the Foundress-Max hypothesis, but the number of nest-searching foundresses did not. This could be attributed to the density of food sites: many food sites may attract many foundresses. Therefore, we subsequently proposed "Foundress-Sum" hypothesis that a foundress chooses her nest site to maximize the sum of energy intake rates. The nest locations supported the Foundress-Max hypothesis more than the Foundress-Sum hypothesis. A profitable food site would affect foundresses' nest site selection.

Central-place foragers, such as bumble bees, are often constrained by their location when collecting resources to provide their young. We compared the resource use (pollen diets) among seven feral colonies of Bombus ardens located in an area of 2.5 · 2.5 km 2 . Because this area was likely to be within their maximum foraging distance, most floral resources could have been accessible to all colonies alike. Similarities in pollen diets among these colonies may suggest that the surrounding resources determine resources use, while deviations from this could reveal other factors that affect resources use among colonies. We examined if colonies showed similarities in pollen diets and if colonies do differ in pollen diets, we investigated whether factors, such as establishment year, colony size, and location, affected the colony pollen diets. We found that while the choices of floral resources were similar, the proportional use of the floral resources were significantly different, suggesting that the surrounding resources do not solely determine resource use among colonies. Further analyses showed that the dissimilarity of pollen diets between two colonies increased as spatial distance decreased, as the temporal distances increased, and as the difference in colony size increased. We found that other than differences in annual variances of resources distribution, colony size was the prominent factor that affected the resource use of our seven colonies. We propose that colony-size-dependent work-force differences and other unidentified colony-size-related factors could have significant effects on floral use among colonies overlapping spatially and temporally.

Previous studies have shown that inhaled particles exacerbate asthma and allergic rhinitis. Several factors related to the particle may play a role in immune-stimulating activity; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We carried out in vitro studies to investigate the effects of TiO(2) particle exposure on antigen presenting activity and expression of the associated cell-surface molecules (Ia, B7.1, B7.2) in rat derived monocytes and alveolar macrophages, in terms of two aspects of the particles: (1) size (59 nm (ST) and 350 nm (LT) particles), and (2) the timing of particle exposure (before antigen exposure or co-administered). Results indicated that particle exposure prior to antigen exposure led to decreased antigen presenting activity in both types of cell. This decrease was greater with ST particles. In monocytes, the expression of cell surface molecules decreased similarly with both particles. Conversely, alveolar macrophages showed greater expression of Ia with ST than with LT exposures. Ia expression was confirmed to be functionally active by a mixed lymphocyte reaction. It is possible that particle exposure might result in poor antigen processing, thereby leading to decreased antigen presenting activity. Co-exposure of particles and antigen induced an increase in antigen presenting activity with both types of particle; however, ST exposure induced greater antigen presenting activity. The expression of Ia also increased similarly with both particle sizes. This suggests that, in a co-exposure situation, antigen may be processed without intensive retardation by particles, and factors other than Ia may affect antigen presenting activity. In conclusion, both size and timing of exposure to TiO(2) particles affect antigen presenting activity of monocytes and alveolar macrophages.