TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractIt is well known that the use of hydrochloric acid to clean up and restore permeability of open holes drilled in limestone formations is a questionable procedure. It is necessary to remove, not only the filter cake at the well bore face but, more importantly, the low permeability crushed zone created during the drilling operation. To achieve uniform treatment of the entire openhole section with hydrochloric acid is difficult: the rapid reaction of the acid in downhole conditions often creates a localized loss zone, through which most of the treating fluid is lost so that treatment of the entire section is inefficient.Traditional completion practice on Al Khalij field (Qatar) involved cemented casing, perforations and subsequent stimulation of the limestone with retarded emulsified hydrochloric acid and ball sealers. This paper describes a new and different approach, which involves leaving drains in openhole condition and using a slow acting stimulation treatment for damage removal and stimulation. The stimulation treatment comprises a starch enzyme to degrade the most troublesome polymer and an organic compound that reacts with the carrier brine to release organic acid in situ over a period of several hours. The breaker fluid is introduced to the openhole section in a neutral pH condition, thus enabling it to be distributed over the entire interval of interest. Enough acid is generated over the subsequent 12 hours to remove the filter cake and clean up the crushed zone.This system has recently been used on several occasions on this field, with openhole drain length ranging from 530 to 1890 m (1,740 to 6,200 ft) and treatment volumes ranging from 20 to 115 m 3 (125 to 725 bbl). Losses from these wells occurred after the predicted elapsed time. Details are provided of how the jobs were carried out and the results achieved.

This paper describes the design and qualification process used to select a reservoir drill-in fluid (RDF) for the Peregrino field offshore Brazil, and the successful application of this fluid. The Peregrino field is located east of Rio de Janeiro in the southwest Campos Basin area. Approximately 2.3 billion barrels of oil are in place in the Peregrino reservoir. The productive sands in this variable reservoir typically exhibit permeabilities between 6 and 15 Darcy, and are unconsolidated with interbedded shales. Peregrino crude oil is heavy (13API) and viscous. The estimated recoverable volume of crude oil is 300 million to 600 million barrels. The selected fluid, a NaCl brine-weighted water-based mud employing KCl and Glycol additions for shale stabilization, was used to drill the first wells at Peregrino. Penetration rates were high and zero non-productive time occurred. To achieve this drilling performance in the high permeability, unconsolidated, heavy oil reservoir, an extensive fluid selection process was performed to optimize the drill in fluid for maximum well productivity. Key test results reviewed in this paper include: Bridging solids optimization, lubrication, shale inhibition, fluids compatibility, filtercake lift off and backflow performance, breaker fluids and formation damage The reservoir sections of the wells were successfully drilled, open-hole-completed with sand screens and gravel packed with 100% efficiency.

TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractIt is well known that the use of hydrochloric acid to clean up and restore permeability of open holes drilled in limestone formations is a questionable procedure. It is necessary to remove, not only the filter cake at the well bore face but, more importantly, the low permeability crushed zone created during the drilling operation. To achieve uniform treatment of the entire openhole section with hydrochloric acid is difficult: the rapid reaction of the acid in downhole conditions often creates a localized loss zone, through which most of the treating fluid is lost so that treatment of the entire section is inefficient.Traditional completion practice on Al Khalij field (Qatar) involved cemented casing, perforations and subsequent stimulation of the limestone with retarded emulsified hydrochloric acid and ball sealers. This paper describes a new and different approach, which involves leaving drains in openhole condition and using a slow acting stimulation treatment for damage removal and stimulation. The stimulation treatment comprises a starch enzyme to degrade the most troublesome polymer and an organic compound that reacts with the carrier brine to release organic acid in situ over a period of several hours. The breaker fluid is introduced to the openhole section in a neutral pH condition, thus enabling it to be distributed over the entire interval of interest. Enough acid is generated over the subsequent 12 hours to remove the filter cake and clean up the crushed zone.This system has recently been used on several occasions on this field, with openhole drain length ranging from 530 to 1890 m (1,740 to 6,200 ft) and treatment volumes ranging from 20 to 115 m 3 (125 to 725 bbl). Losses from these wells occurred after the predicted elapsed time. Details are provided of how the jobs were carried out and the results achieved.

When used for running sand control screens, low-solids, oil-based completion fluids (LSOBCF) maintain reservoir wellbore stability and integrity while minimizing the potential risks of losses, screen plugging, completion damage, and productivity impairment. Until now, using LSOBCF as a screen running fluid (SRF) has been limited by fluid density. The design, qualification, and first deployment of an LSOBCF that incorporates a newly developed, high-density brine as the internal phase to extend the density limit is discussed. The following parameters were examined as part of the preliminary qualification: rheology performance, long-term stability, fluid loss (filter-cake repair capability), reservoir fluid and drill-in fluid (RDIF) compatibility tests, emulsion breaking test, production screen test (PST) on 275 µm screen, crystallization temperature [true crystallization temperature (TCT) and pressurized crystallization temperature (PCT)], and corrosion rate. The fluid was then tested for formation and completion damage performance, where the high-density, brine-based LSOBCF exhibited minimally damaging behavior in the core-flow tests. As a result of the positive observations made during these wide-ranging laboratory tests, this new high density-based brine was deemed as a good candidate in an LSOBCF for high-density SRF applications. Viable LSOBCF with densities up to 1.50 SG have been designed. This paper details the design and field application of a 1.45 SG LSOBCF. Calcium bromide (CaBr2) brine is commonly used during the discontinuous phase for LSOBCF applications that require fluid densities up to 1.38 SG. For higher density requirements, LSOBCF use a cesium formate brine as a discontinuous phase. Using the new developed brine in the discontinuous phase provides viable LSOBCF up to 1.50 SG. The base brine has a good environmental rating, is pH neutral, and provides improved safety during low-temperature/high-pressure conditions. As a standalone fluid, the new brine can achieve densities up to 1.80 SG, with acceptable TCT and PCT values for North Sea applications without using zinc or formate-based brines. After laboratory qualification, the final fluid formulation was deployed on a dual lateral oil producer well with 9.5 in. horizontal reservoir section lengths of 2315 and 1696 m. After drilling the sections using an engineered low equivalent circulating density (ECD) oil-based RDIF (OB RDIF), each section was sequentially displaced to 1.45 SG LSOBCF. The lower completion, consisting of 5.5 in. screens equipped with autonomous inflow control devices (AICD) and swellable packers, was successfully run to bottom without significant issues. The field application demonstrated evident operational efficiency gains. The positive pre-deployment formation response test (FRT) results have been verified by well productivity data. The process to qualify the brine for first-use application in LSOBCF is described, and laboratory testing (including FRT), mixing and logistical considerations, field execution, and well productivity are discussed.

The mechanical friction generated during drilling operations can be problematic in long, narrow, deviated and highly inclined wells. Efforts to reduce the excessive friction include application of synthetic-based muds or oil lubricants. However, these fluids are highly restricted because of environmental concerns. Even adding small amounts of oil-based lubricants to water-based fluid can raise environmental and formation damage concerns.Shaker blinding issues were observed while drilling a heavy oil reservoir in the Peregrino field offshore Brazil. Based on field observations, the blinding was thought to be caused by a combination of the heavy crude oil, drill cuttings, and mud lubricant. An extensive laboratory study included simulation of screen blinding, a compatibility study between mud lubricants, heavy crude oil and drill cuttings, and, ultimately, a proposed solution based on a combination of mud additives to help to mitigate the problem.During this study, several lubricants and combinations of additives were subjected to a sensitivity study based on technical and environmental requirements to select an optimized and customized solution. The study included friction coefficient determination to compare the performance of proposed combinations and actual drill-in fluid being used. For the screen blinding simulation, a mechanical shift sieving apparatus was used. An unconventional lab test was adapted from existing completion fluids literature for the compatibility study.The study also included shaker screen visual and microscopy analysis, as well as analytical chemistry laboratory determination of the nature of screen blinding with elemental analyses, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Grease, sieve, and emulsion potential tests were run using liquid additives from mud formulations described in previous lab testing for the screen blinding issue. For the emulsion potential tests, formulations were treated with 1% v/v crude oil and combinations of 1% v/v lubricants and solvents in an attempt to prevent/mitigate possible interactions of these components with the crude oil.A lubricant cocktail provided the best performance in the lubricity test, improving the lubricity coefficient from 0.303 (blank) to 0.15, with a torque reduction of 55.8%. The solution contained no grease and was formulated using environmentally acceptable components with minimal formation damage risk.