Do firms substantively improve their corporate environmental performance (CEP), or do they just react symbolically under the government's environmental subsidy (ENS) scheme? There is little empirical research into this business ethical problem in the literature. To understand how firms respond to the government's ENS scheme, in this study, we empirically examine the relationship between ENS and CEP. Specifically, we
Environmental labeling certification (ELC) is a new type of voluntary environmental regulation for firm environmental governance. This study examines the impacts of ELC on firm environmental performance (EP) and financial performance (FP) from the resource management perspective. Based on a sample of 1325 Chinese A-share listed manufacturing firms from 2008 to 2016 with 9972 firm-year observations, it is found that ELC improves firm EP, but has a limited impact on firm FP. Specifically, ELC is found to have a significant impact on firm annual operating income (AOI) and Tobin's q, but has no impact on return on assets (ROA). Therefore, ELC has not yet promoted firms to achieve a win-win situation between EP and FP. Further analysis reveals that ELC can trigger environmental innovation offsets, but the effect of environmental innovation offsets is weak at present. Moreover, the impact of ELC on firm FP reflects the heterogeneity of the ownership structure. This study not only contributes to the existing literature, but also makes extensive practical contributions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.