Introduction:Tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis is highly effective in providing speech after total laryngectomy. Although it is a safe method, in certain cases dilatation or leakage occurs around the prosthesis that needs closure of tracheoesophageal fistula. Both non-surgical and surgical methods for closure have been described. Surgical methods are used when non-surgical methods fail. We present the use of the sternocleidomastoid musculocutaneous (SCMMC) transposition flap for the closure of tracheoesophageal fistula.Materials and Methods:An incision is made at the mucocutaneous junction circumferentially around the tracheostoma. Tracheoesophageal space is dissected down to and beyond the fistula. The tracheoesophageal tract is divided. The oesophageal mucosa is closed with simple sutures. Then SCMMC transposition flap is raised and transposed to cover sutured oesophagus and the defect between the oesophagus and the trachea.Results:This study was done prospectively over a period of 1 year from June 2012 to May 2013. This technique was used in patients with pliable neck skin. In nine patients, this procedure was done (inferior based flap in nine cases) and it was successful in eight patients. In one case, there was dehiscence at the leading edge of flap with oesophageal dehiscence, which required a second procedure. In two cases, there was marginal necrosis of flap, which healed without any intervention. Nine patients in this series were post-radiation.Conclusion:This method of closure is simple and effective for patients with pliable neck skin, who require permanent closure of the tracheoesophageal fistula.

Background: Microvascular reconstruction after oncologic resection with curative intent in recurrent or second primary cancer cases is challenging not only because of the complexity of the defect but also due to difficulty in finding suitable donor vessels in the neck that has already been subjected to surgery and subsequent adjuvant treatment. In our present study, we evaluated the success of free flaps, reexplorations, and factors associated with reexploration and with flap failures in previously operated and/or radiated neck. Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed patients who underwent microvascular reconstruction from January 2016 to December 2018 in patients with previous surgery and/or radiation, considered as "already treated neck" (ATN). These cases were reviewed to analyze variables that included age, sex, indication for surgery (recurrence, second primary, osteoradionecrosis, and secondary reconstruction), duration since previous surgery or radiation, free flap done, donor vessels used, the need to go to the contralateral neck or outside the neck, need for vein grafts, flap reexploration rate, flap survival rate, and hospital stay of the patients. We also tried to identify factors that predisposed for a reexploration after performing reconstruction with a free flap in ATN. Results: Of 1522 free flaps done, 371 patients were included in the study. Flap success rate was 90.8% in ATN, which was comparable to naive neck (94%; P = 0.108). The reexploration rate in ATN (16.2%) was significantly higher (P = 0.0003) than in naive neck (9.8%). The previous treatment (neck dissection) received [P = 0.001; odds ratio, 13.7 (1.87-101.6)] was the most significant predisposing factor, and patients undergoing osteocutaneous flaps were more prone to undergo reexplorations (P = 0.05). Side of anastomosis, vessel used for anastomosis, comorbidities, and time since previous treatment did not affect the reexploration rate significantly. Conclusions: Microvascular reconstruction can be safely performed in ATN with good success rates, and it should not be a deterrent in whom free flap is required to achieve best functional outcome. However, it may be associated with increase in reexploration rates in the postoperative period. Patients having undergone a previous neck dissection are at more risk of undergoing this reexploration in comparison with radiotherapy (RT)/chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CTRT) alone.

PURPOSE Quality of life has become an integral aspect of the management of breast cancer. Many women still need to undergo a modified radical mastectomy (MRM). Factors affecting the choice a woman makes to undergo breast reconstruction (BR) are unclear and are hypothesized to be influenced by socioeconomic factors. We conducted a survey to evaluate the awareness and acceptability of BR among women with breast cancer at our institution. METHODS A novel questionnaire was designed and served to 3 groups of women: planned for MRM, follow up (FU) post-MRM, and FU post breast-conserving surgery. RESULTS Responses were analyzed from 492 women. Of these, 280 (56.91%) were planned for MRM and 212 (43.08%) women were on FU. Almost 45% women were older than 50 years of age, and literacy rate was 87.6%. More than 70% were homemakers and 15 women (3%) were unmarried. The aspects evaluating awareness of BR suggested that 251 (51.01%) women had knowledge about BR. Major source of information was the surgeon (45.81%) and media (32.87%). About 80% women on FU post-MRM did not want reconstruction, and 55% did not opt for BR as they had coped with the mastectomy and did not feel the need for BR. Only 6% cited family or financial reasons and 10% cited recurrence concerns. Among women planned for surgery, 65.71% had not considered BR. When questioned, 25 (12.88%) felt influenced by cost, 102 (52.58%) felt they did not need it, and 20 (10.31%) were worried it would affect treatment. CONCLUSION Our study shows high awareness regarding BR, but only 27.89% women opt for BR independent of economic issues. We recommend all patients should be counseled about the reconstructive options when their MRM is planned.

Context: Post-tumour resection lower limb salvage. Aim/Introduction: Resection of tumours of the femur and tibia around the knee and ankle joints results in large bony defects. Often arthrodesis is an alternative; in case, adequate functional motors cannot be preserved or due to economic constraints. Thus, in an immunocompromised patient, the vascularised fibula is the best form of reconstruction. The vascularised fibular flap (pedicled/free) can be used in combination with an allograft. We refer to such a combination reconstruction as ‘allocombo’. The vascularised fibular graft hypertrophies in due course of time, and till that period, the allograft provides the required mechanical strength to allow early ambulation. Subjects and Methods: A retrospective study of 24 cases of vascularised fibular graft for lower limb reconstruction was conducted from February 2003 to March 2014. The average defect size was 15.5 cm and the average length of fibula harvested was 24.35 cm. A total of 19 free fibular flaps and 5 pedicled fibula were done. Mean age was 26 years. Fibula was nestled in the allograft obtained from the tissue bank. Results: The mean follow-up time was 52 months. Free flap success rate was 96%. Successful healing was achieved at 45 ends (97.8%). Radiological evidence of union at osteotomy sites occurred at an average of 6.8 months. Eight patients eventually succumbed to disease. At the final follow-up, the mean Musculoskeletal Tumour Society functional score of the evaluable patients was 26 (range 20–30). Conclusions: Pedicled fibula is a good option if the defect is within 14 cm of the knee joint at the femoral end. The vessels have to curve around the fibular head, thus its removal improves the reach of the pedicle. The flap is easy to harvest with predictable vascular anatomy and it can provide a large amount of vascularised bone and skin paddle. It results in early ambulation, rehabilitation and reduced morbidity. We realised that fixation is easier and chances of vascular injury are less in free as compared to pedicled fibula.