Purpose Psychological distress among pre-operative cancer patients interferes with treatment outcomes. A randomized, single-blind, two arm, parallel group controlled trial was conducted to determine the effectiveness of a 3-week brief psychological intervention versus routine care on reducing psychological distress among 18–65 year old newly diagnosed cancer patients awaiting surgery at Colombo South Teaching Hospital. Methods After screening 153 patients for eligibility, 88 were recruited (intervention = 46, control = 42). The primary outcome, psychological distress, was assessed using HADS (cut-off 8) at baseline and 3-weeks later. Secondary outcomes assessed were satisfaction on knowledge and care they received and the physical well-being. Comparisons were made using McNemar’s Chi-Square at p < 0.05 based on intention to treat. Effects measures used are odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI and number needed to treat (NNT). Results Prevalence of anxiety and depression at baseline was 90.91% and 89.77%. Intervention significantly lowered anxiety [intervention 30.43% vs control 69.50%, OR = 0.20 (95% CI 0.08, 0.49), p = 0.0004]. Depression failed to show a significant reduction [67.6% vs 78.4%, OR = 0.53 (95% CI 0.22, 1.28), p = 0.1592]. NNT to avert one case of anxiety is 3 (95% CI 1.73, 5.18). Satisfaction on care received is the only secondary outcome that showed a statistically significant association: intervention 36.96% vs. control 14.28% [OR = 0.28 (95% CI 0.10–0.81), p = 0.0057]. Conclusion The brief psychological intervention was effective in reducing anxiety among newly diagnosed cancer patients. This simple and brief psychological intervention could be recommended for all new cancer patients awaiting surgical interventions. This trial was registered in the Sri Lanka clinical trial registry on 14.10. 2021. The registration number is SLCTR/2021/028. The protocol is available at the Sri Lanka clinical trial registry website. The Universal Trial Number (UTN) is U1111-1269-2819.

Response rate was 99.1% (n=832) and 96.1% (n=808) for antenatal and postnatal components respectively. Average number of clinic visits was 10.3 while 4.0%(n=34) had not attended any antenatal clinic. Of mothers 86.8%(n=547) had complied with the referral to specialist care. Pre pregnancy folic acid was reported by 61.5% (n=512) while 92.8%(n=772) and 90.3%(n=751) of mothers reported with compliance to iron and calcium tablets intake. Only 74.0%(n=616) of mothers and 45.0% (n=374) of spouses had attended at least one antenatal classes. Of mothers who referred to oral health care 578(83.4%) had complied and 674(81%) had an emergency preparedness plan. Among the participants 89.7% (n=746) and 88.0% (n=732) had at least a single measure of blood sugar and haemoglobin respectively. Early ultra sound scan was available for 87.5% of mothers. Of mothers who referred to oral health care, 578(83.4%) had complied and 674 (81%) had an emergency preparedness plan. Postnatal clinic visits were made by 83.9% (n=678) of mothers. By two months postpartum 63.2%(n=511) were on a family planning method. Conclusion and/or Recommendations Upon provision of care, adherence of mothers to the practices was satisfactory. However, programmatic approach needs to be followed to improve the coverage of interventions.