Regardless of the overwhelming use of next-generation sequencing technologies, microarray-based genotyping combined with the imputation of untyped variants remains a cost-effective means to interrogate genetic variations across the human genome. This technology is widely used in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) at bio-bank scales, and more recently, in polygenic score (PGS) analysis to predict and stratify disease risk. Over the last decade, human genotyping arrays have undergone a tremendous growth in both number and content making a comprehensive evaluation of their performances became more important. Here, we performed a comprehensive performance assessment for 23 available human genotyping arrays in 6 ancestry groups using diverse public and in-house datasets. The analyses focus on performance estimation of derived imputation (in terms of accuracy and coverage) and PGS (in terms of concordance to PGS estimated from whole-genome sequencing data) in three different traits and diseases. We found that the arrays with a higher number of SNPs are not necessarily the ones with higher imputation performance, but the arrays that are well-optimized for the targeted population could provide very good imputation performance. In addition, PGS estimated by imputed SNP array data is highly correlated to PGS estimated by whole-genome sequencing data in most cases. When optimal arrays are used, the correlations of PGS between two types of data are higher than 0.97, but interestingly, arrays with high density can result in lower PGS performance. Our results suggest the importance of properly selecting a suitable genotyping array for PGS applications. Finally, we developed a web tool that provides interactive analyses of tag SNP contents and imputation performance based on population and genomic regions of interest. This study would act as a practical guide for researchers to design their genotyping arrays-based studies. The tool is available at: https://genome.vinbigdata.org/tools/saa/.

Most polygenic risk score (PRS)models have been based on data from populations of European origins (accounting for the majority of the large genomics datasets, e.g. >78% in the UK Biobank and >85% in the GTEx project). Although several large-scale Asian biobanks were initiated (e.g. Japanese, Korean, Han Chinese biobanks), most other Asian countries have little or near-zero genomics data. To implement PRS models for under-represented populations, we explored transfer learning approaches, assuming that information from existing large datasets can compensate for the small sample size that can be feasibly obtained in developing countries, like Vietnam. Here, we benchmark 13 common PRS methods in meta-population strategy (combining individual genotype data from multiple populations) and multi-population strategy (combining summary statistics from multiple populations). Our results highlight the complementarity of different populations and the choice of methods should depend on the target population. Based on these results, we discussed a set of guidelines to help users select the best method for their datasets. We developed a robust and comprehensive software to allow for benchmarking comparisons between methods and proposed a computational framework for improving PRS performance in a dataset with a small sample size. This work is expected to inform the development of genomics applications in under-represented populations. PRSUP framework is available at: https://github.com/BiomedicalMachineLearning/VGP