This work was carried out in collaboration between all authors. Authors OMO, BUE and EAN were involved in the design and writing of the protocol and the first draft. Authors BCO and OAO were involved in the statistical analysis. Author NUB was involved in laboratory analysis of the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Background: Visually estimated blood loss has long been known to be imprecise, inaccurate, and often underestimated, which may lead to delayed diagnosis and treatment. Aim: To determine the accuracy of blood estimates by health workers in surgical and obstetric specialties. Methodology: This was a cross sectional single blinded observational study done in January 2016 to determine discrepancy between actual blood loss (ABL) and estimated blood loss (EBL) by consenting healthcare practitioners working in various surgical and obstetric departments of the Federal Medical centre, Owerri. Reconstituted whole blood was obtained from the blood bank, and simulated scenarios with known measured blood loss were created using common surgical materials. Visually estimated blood loss was performed by medical personnel. Percent errors of estimated blood loss were calculated and comparisons were made among the health professionals. The statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 21. Results: A total of 113 health professionals comprising 64 doctors and 49 nurses assessed 7 clinical scenarios. On the average, there was a general tendency for the health workers to under estimate the volume. Majority of the participants underestimated the blood volume by more than 20% of actual volume. Though the nurses were more likely to underestimate blood volume than the doctors however, there was no statistical difference between the estimations by the nurses and the doctors except in station 3 with a p value of 0.045. Conclusion: This finding calls for action in training and retraining of every health worker in blood loss estimation, so that intervention can be initiated early.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.