Background The prognosis of patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) with regards to intensive care unit (ICU) admission, short- and long-term mortality is correlated with patient’s comorbidities. For patients hospitalized for CAP, including P-CAP, we assessed the prognostic impact of comorbidities known as at-risk (AR) or high-risk (HR) of pneumococcal CAP (P-CAP), and of the number of combined comorbidities. Methods Data on hospitalizations for CAP among the French 50+ population were extracted from the 2014 French Information Systems Medicalization Program (PMSI), an exhaustive national hospital discharge database maintained by the French Technical Agency of Information on Hospitalization (ATIH). Their admission diagnosis, comorbidities (nature, risk type and number), other characteristics, and their subsequent hospital stays within the year following their hospitalization for CAP were analyzed. Logistic regression models were used to assess the associations between ICU transfer, short- and 1-year in-hospital mortality and all covariates. Results From 182,858 patients, 149,555 patients aged ≥ 50 years (nonagenarians 17.8%) were hospitalized for CAP in 2014, including 8270 with P-CAP. Overall, 33.8% and 90.5% had ≥ 1 HR and ≥ 1 AR comorbidity, respectively. Cardiac diseases were the most frequent AR comorbidity (all CAP: 77.4%). Transfer in ICU occurred for 5.4% of CAP patients and 19.4% for P-CAP. Short-term and 1-year in-hospital mortality rates were 10.9% and 23% of CAP patients, respectively, significantly lower for P-CAP patients: 9.2% and 19.8% (HR 0.88 [95% CI 0.84–0.93], p < .0001). Both terms of mortality increased mostly with age, and with the number of comorbidities and combination of AR and HR comorbidities, in addition of specific comorbidities. Conclusions Not only specific comorbidities, but also the number of combined comorbidities and the combination of AR and HR comorbidities may impact the outcome of hospitalized CAP and P-CAP patients.

No abstract

No abstract

Introduction: Lyme borreliosis (LB) is a growing public health concern requiring accurate and comprehensive epidemiological knowledge to inform health care interventions. This study compared the epidemiology of LB in primary care and hospital settings, using for the first time in France three sources of data, and highlighted specific populations at higher risk of developing LB. Methods: This study analyzed data from general practitioner networks ( i.e ., Sentinel network, Electronic Medical Records [EMR]) and the national hospital discharge database to describe the LB epidemiology from 2010 to 2019. Results: The average annual incidence rates of LB in primary care increased from 42.3 cases/100,000 population in 2010–2012 to 83.0/100,000 in 2017–2019 for the Sentinel Network and 42.7/100,000 to 74.6/100,000 for the EMR, following a marked rise in 2016. The annual hospitalization rate remained stable from 2012 to 2019 fluctuating between 1.6 and 1.8 hospitalizations/100,000. Women were more likely to present with LB in primary care setting compared with men (male-to-female incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.92), whereas men were predominant among hospitalizations (IRR = 1.4), with the largest discordance among adolescents aged 10–14 years (IRR = 1.8) and adults aged 80 years and older (IRR = 2.5). In 2017–2019, the average annual incidence rate peaked among persons aged 60–69 years in primary care (>125/100,000) and aged 70–79 years among hospitalized patients (3.4/100,000). A second peak occurred in children aged 0–4 or 5–9 years depending on sources. Incidence rates in Limousin and the north-eastern regions were the highest for both primary care and hospital settings. Conclusions: Analyses showed disparities in the evolution of incidence, sex-specific incidence rates, and predominant age groups between primary care and hospital settings that merit further exploration.

No abstract