No abstract

lower costs directly related to the method (-C ¼ 1,371.16), however associated hospitalisation costs were higher due to longer hospitalisation (5 days versus 4 days). Conclusion Even though CRB is an effective method to induce labour at a lower cost than Propess in our pilot test, a longer hospitalisation length was observed with this device. Further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy, safety and all direct costs involved in these techniques and also considering other available methods.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract