This paper reviews research on attitudes and behaviours towards environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), with a special focus on child health and the indoor environment. Research needs and ways forward to encourage reductions in domestic ETS levels are discussed. Published material was identified through online literature searches (Medline, Toxline, Cancerlit, Biosis, Embase, Enviroline, Sociological Abstracts, Social Science Citation Index, Academic Index and Psychinfo). The literature search strategy employed search terms such as "passive smoking" or "environmental tobacco smoke" with "attitude" or "awareness" and other synonyms. Additional publications were identified by citation chasing and expert advice. Focusing on the UK, studies that provided survey-derived data about attitudes and behaviours in relation to ETS exposure in the indoor environment were selected for review. Published studies from other countries were also included when they provided information pertinent to this review. Most people are aware of the health risks associated with ETS exposure, and there is a high level of support for smoking restrictions in public places to protect non-smokers from ETS. However, although there is concern among both non-smoking and smoking parents about children and second-hand smoke, many people allow children to be exposed to ETS in the home. The review suggests that traditional health promotion campaigns have had only limited success in encouraging ETS risk reduction measures in the home. Because ETS is a public health priority, particularly in relation to child health, the barriers to the uptake of such measures need to be explored in detail to inform the future promotion of reductions in domestic levels of ETS.

In this paper, the population attributable risk (PAR), a measure of the excess risk of disease associated with a risk factor, is calculated for some of the common adverse health effects that have been associated with exposure of children to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS): childhood lower respiratory illness, chronic middle ear disease, asthma and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). Published data on both risk estimates and the percentage of children exposed to ETS in the home (prevalence of ETS) have been utilised. The percentage of childhood lower respiratory illness and middle ear disease typically attributable to ETS from either parent smoking ranged from 9% for asthma prevalence and for referral for glue ear, to 25% for hospital admission for lower respiratory illness. Where data were available to calculate PARs separately for mother only smoking and father only smoking, the PARs were generally larger for mothers only smoking, due mainly to higher odds ratios for mothers only smoking. The PAR for SIDS attributable to ETS from mother only smoking was 11%. Although based on a small number of studies, the PAR for SIDS attributable to smoking of fathers only was similar to that attributable to the smoking of mothers only, largely due to the higher prevalence of households where only the father smokes. This study has shown that the impact of ETS on childhood illness can be considerable, emphasising the importance of the need to develop effective strategies for reducing the risk of ETS exposure in the home and elsewhere.

No abstract