Advances in cancer treatment have led to significant improvements in the likelihood of reaching remission and long-term survival for men. Chemo- and radiotherapy-induced infertility are significant treatment side effects. Cryopreservation before the start of treatment enables sperm to be stored, thereby preserving the man's potential fertility. Here, we describe the successful use (with ICSI) of sperm cryopreserved prior to cancer treatment, for a total of 21 years. We believe this to be the longest period of sperm cryopreservation, resulting in a live birth, so far reported in the literature.
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a serious and potentially life-threatening complication following ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF). Coasting is the practice whereby the gonadotrophins are withheld and the administration of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) is delayed until serum oestradiol (E2) has decreased to what is considered to be a safe level, to prevent the onset of OHSS. This study aimed to assess the length of coasting on the reproductive outcome in women at risk of developing OHSS. Coasting was undertaken when the serum E2 concentrations were > or = 17000 pmol/L but < 21000 pmol/L. Daily E2 measurements were performed and hCG was administered when hormone levels decreased to < 17000 pmol/L. Eighty-one women who had their stimulation cycles coasted were grouped according to the number of coasting days. Severe OHSS occurred in one case, which represented 1.2% of patients who underwent coasting because of an increased risk of developing the syndrome. No difference was found between cycles coasted for 1 - 3 days and cycles coasted for > or = 4 days in terms of oocyte maturity, fertilization and embryo cleavage rates. Women in whom coasting lasted for > or = 4 days had significantly fewer oocytes retrieved (P < 0.05) and decreased implantation rate (P < 0.05) compared to those coasted for 1 - 3 days. Pregnancy rate/embryo transfer and live birth rate did not differ between groups. In conclusion, coasting appears to decrease the risk of OHSS without compromising the IVF cycle pregnancy outcome. Prolonged coasting is, however, associated with reduced implantation rates, perhaps due to the deleterious effects on the endometrium rather than the oocytes.
Two cases are reported of successful pregnancies following long-term semen banking prior to chemotherapy and radiotherapy for malignancy. With the first case, the patient banked semen at the age of 20 years prior to chemotherapy for Hodgkin's disease; 11 years later the thawed semen was used for IVF with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), resulting in twins being born following the transfer of frozen-thawed embryos. In the second case, the patient banked semen at the age of 17 years prior to chemotherapy and radiotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia; 8 years later it was used for ICSI, resulting in triplets being born following the transfer of frozen-thawed embryos. These cases support long-term semen banking for men whose future fertility may be compromised by suppression of spermatogenesis secondary to administration of chemo/radiotherapy treatment. The advent of successful ICSI combined with embryo cryopreservation has increased the chance of thawed cryopreserved semen achieving fertilization. Banking of a single ejaculate prior to commencement of chemotherapy/radiotherapy treatment may preserve potential fertility without compromising the oncology treatment.
This study analysed the live birth rates in 760 couples referred in 1994 to St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, a non-fee-paying National Health Service (NHS) centre, who had waited for up to 4 years for IVF treatment. These live birth rates were compared with those of 199 couples referred at a similar time to Manchester Fertility Services, a fee-paying unit, where they received IVF treatment shortly after referral. The waiting time was advantageous in that 17.8% (135 of 760) of the couples referred to St Mary's Hospital conceived without IVF treatment, 60% within one year of referral. However, the waiting time was detrimental to women aged 30-34 in whom treatment was delayed by 3-4 years. Only 26.8% (204 of 760) of couples originally referred eventually received NHS-funded IVF treatment at St Mary's. A waiting time not exceeding 18 months would allow most spontaneous conceptions and reduce the adverse effect of prolonged waiting on the take-up rate for treatment and on the chance of success in the older women.
Insemination with donor spermatozoa is an integral part of infertility treatment. For the last 3 years in our unit, intrauterine insemination with donor spermatozoa (IUID) has been used in preference to vaginal insemination. In this retrospective study, patients were offered an initial course of five single intrauterine inseminations with cryopreserved donor spermatozoa and treatment was then reviewed. A total of 389 patients received 1465 inseminations. In all, 1119 cycles were monitored using luteinizing hormone serum analyses and 346 cycles using the urine home test kits. The clinical pregnancy rate per insemination for the cycles monitored by the serum assay was 18.0% (202/1119) compared with the urine cycles (13.7%, 46/346) (P <05). The pregnancy loss rate was not significantly different (14.4%, 29/202 and 21.7%, 10/46) (serum and urine cycles respectively). The viable clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher (P <03) for the serum cycles than for the cycles using the urinary monitoring (15.5%, 173/1119 and 10.4%, 36/346 respectively). The cycles monitored by serum assay had a significantly higher cumulative viable clinical pregnancy rate (P <0001) of 70.2% after nine inseminations compared with the urine monitored cycles of 54.8%. The majority of patients opted for the serum cycles, with a minority self-selecting the urine cycles mainly for travelling convenience. The explanation for the significant differences between the viable clinical pregnancy rates per insemination and the cumulative viable clinical pregnancy rates may be due to the sensitivity of the urine home test kit or the patients' interpretation of the result.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.