Thermodynamic binding constants for the interactions of mononitrated neurophysins with oxytocin, vasopressin, and peptide analogues of the hormones were determined by using a spectrophotometric titration technique. The data were fit to a binding model which included all known interactions in these systems. From an examination of the free energies for the binding reaction, we concluded that residues 1-3 contribute 84% of the binding energy for formation of the neurophysin dimer mono complex and 79% for the formation of the bis complex. Rate constants for complex formation and dissociation with native bovine neurophysin were determined by using temperature-jump relaxation. The association rate constants for neurophysin dimer binding to oxytocin, vasopressin, and the peptide analogues were all in the range of 1.3 X 10(6) M-1 s-1 for mono complexation and 1.5 X 10(6) M-1 s-1 for bis complexation. Thus, formation rate constants are identical for both mono and bis complexation, and no significant differences exist between formation constants for hormones and peptides. On the other hand, a clear distinction in dissociation rate constants is apparent when one compares the hormones (kr = 4 to 16 s-1) with the peptide analogues (kr = 54 to 182 s-1). There is rougly a tenfold increase in overall dissociation rate constant when one compares the peptides to the hormones. From these data, we conclude that the rate-determining step in the association reaction involves the first two or three residues on the hormone. After the initial binding takes place, only with intact hormone, i.e., oxytocin or vasopressin, can additional bonding interactions in the complex take place. These additional interactions are reflected in the slower off-rate of the hormone complexes relative to the peptide complexes.

By use of stopped‐flow kinetic data, we have measured the kinetics of mononitrated neurophysin I monomer binding to oxytocin. The association rate constant was 1.3(±0.3) × 105 M‐1 s‐1 and the dissociation rate constant was 2.0 (± 0.5)s‐1 for protonated oxytocin binding. Both rates are significantly slower than those observed for neurophysin dimer. These data suggest that the binding process by which the monomer binds oxytocin is not identical to that of dimer.