Despite many ecological and evolutionary studies, the history of several species complexes within the freshwater crustacean genus Daphnia (Branchiopoda, Anomopoda) is poorly understood. In particular, the Daphnia longispina group, comprising several large‐lake species, is characterized by pronounced phenotypic plasticity, many hybridizing species and backcrossing. We studied clonal assemblages from lakes and ponds comprising daphnids from several species complexes. In order to reveal patterns of reticulate evolution and introgression among species, we analysed three data sets and compared nuclear, mtDNA and morphological divergence using animals from 158 newly established clonal cultures. By examining 15 nuclear and 11 mitochondrial (12S/16S rDNA) genetic characters (allozymes/restriction enzymes), and 48 morphological traits, we found high clonal diversity and discontinuities in genotypic and morphological space which allowed us to group clones by cytonuclear differentiation into seven units (outgroup D. pulex). In contrast to six groups emerging from nuclear divergence (related to three traditional species, D. cucullata, D. galeata, D. hyalina and three pairwise intermediate hybrids), a seventh group of clones was clearly resolved by morphological divergence: distinct mtDNA haplotypes within one nuclear defined cluster, ‘D. hyalina’, resembled traditional D. hyalina and D. rosea phenotypes, respectively. In other nuclear defined clusters, association between mtDNA haplotype and morphology was low, despite hybridization being bidirectional (reciprocal crosses). Morphological divergence was greatest between young sister species which are separated on the lake/pond level, suggesting a significant role for divergent selection during speciation along with habitat shifts. Phylogenetic analyses were restricted to four cytonuclear groups of clones related to species. mtDNA and nuclear phylogenies were consistent in low genetic divergence and monophyly of D. hyalina and D. rosea. Incongruent patterns of phylogenies and different levels of genetic differentiation between traditional species suggest reticulate evolutionary processes.
Cladoceran crustaceans are an important component of zooplankton in a wide range of freshwater habitats. Although the ecological characteristics of several cladoceran species have been well studied, biogeographical studies have been hampered by problematic taxonomic affiliations. However, recently developed molecular techniques, provide a powerful tool to subject aquatic taxa to comparative analyses. Here we highlight recent molecular approaches in aquatic ecology by presenting a simple method of DNA preparation and PCR amplification of the mitochondrial DNA (16S rDNA) in species from nine different families within the cladocera. On a broad taxonomic scale, sequence analysis of this mtDNA fragment has been used to produce the first molecular based phylogeny of the cladocera. This analysis clustered the cladoceran families in a fashion similar to that suggested by previous systematic classifications. In a more detailed analysis of the family Daphniidae, nuclear randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), mitochondrial restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and morphological analyses were combined to identify species and interspecific hybrids within the Daphnia galeata species complex across 50 lakes in 13 European countries and one lake in Africa. The study revealed interspecific hybridization and backcrossing between some taxa (D. cucullata and D. galeata) to be widespread, and species and hybrids to frequently occur in sympatry. Genetic, as well as morphological information, suggests the occurrence of D. hyalina outside the Holarctic.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.