Slovakia has adopted an amendment to Act No. 363/2011, regulating, among other things, drug reimbursement and is undergoing a significant change in the availability of innovative treatments for patients. High expectations are associated with arrangements related to performance-based managed entry agreements. Opinions and positions towards this change appear to be inconsistent, and for the further application of the law in practice and when setting up the main implementation processes, it is necessary to understand the positions and opinions of the individual actors who are involved in the PB-MEA process. The interviews were conducted in the period from 20 May to 15 August 2022 around the same time as the finalisation of the amendment to Act No. 363/2011 and its adoption. A roughly one-hour open interview was conducted on a sample of 12 stakeholders in the following groups: representatives of the Ministry of Health, health-care providers, pharmaceutical companies and others, including a health insurance company. The main objective was to qualitatively describe the perception of this topic by key stakeholders in Slovakia. The responses were analysed using MAXQDATA 2022 software to obtain codes associated with key expressions. We identified three main strong top categories of expressions that strongly dominated the pro-management interviews with stakeholders: legislation, opportunities and threats. Ambiguity and insufficient coverage of the new law, improved availability of medicinal products and threats associated with data, IT systems and potentially unfavourable new reimbursement schemes were identified as key topics of each of the said top categories, respectively. Among individual sets of respondents, there is frequent consensus on both opportunities and threats in the area of implementing process changes in PB-MEA. For the successful implementation of the law in practice, some basic threats need to be removed, among which in particular is insufficient data infrastructure.

Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, most settings experienced healthcare service disruptions. The majority of cytological screening procedures were postponed to focus on assisting patients infected with COVID-19. In this study, we aimed to analyse the impact of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the uptake of cervical cancer screening in Slovakia. Methods Data on cytological screening procedures were obtained from two of the three health insurance companies in Slovakia for the years 2019 and 2020, covering the population of women aged 15 and older. All data were calculated stratified for age groups. Rates of cytological screenings were calculated as the number of procedures per women registered in the insurance company in the same age group and rate ratios were calculated as ratios of the rates for the years 2020 and 2019 for the same age group. Incidence rates were calculated as the number of newly diagnosed cervical cancer cases per women registered in the insurance company in the respective year. Results Rate ratios of cytological screening procedures revealed that in both examined health insurance companies, the rate of cytological exams was lower in 2020 compared to 2019 (0.95 and 0.89). This was observed across all age groups. The results showed a clear and statistically significant age gradient, indicating that the level of disruption increased with age. The age group 60-69 years had the highest incidence rate of cervical cancer in 2019, at 54.3 per 100 000. In 2020, the highest rate was 48.3 in the age group 50-59 years. The lowest rates were in children and young adults (<20 years). Conclusions This study confirms the significant impact of the pandemic on cervical cancer screening uptake in Slovakia, which may have delayed the diagnosis of cervical cancer into later stages of the disease with a worse prognosis. This may lead to increased mortality and years lived with disability due to this disease in Slovakia. Key messages • Disruptions in cervical cancer screenings were observed in Slovakia during the COVID-19 pandemic which may result in an increase in cervical cancer incidence and mortality. • Strategies should be implemented to maintain cancer screening programs during health emergencies to avoid excessive mortality and morbidity.