Non-steroidal antioestrogens, such as tamoxifen, inhibit the growth of human breast cancer cells. The experiments described here compare and contrast the efficacy of tamoxifen and the 'pure' antioestrogen, ICI 164384, on the inhibition of proliferation of MCF-7 cells. Previous studies have shown that ICI 164384 has a greater maximal inhibitory effect than conventional antioestrogens on the growth of MCF-7 cells. Both types of compound block progression of cells through the cell cycle in the early G1 phase. These studies have been extended to measure the population distribution of antioestrogen-treated cells by the use of two-parameter flow cytometry. ICI 164384 proved to be more effective than tamoxifen in decreasing the proportion of actively growing cells in an asynchronous population. In cells grown in the complete absence of exogenous oestrogens, growth was stimulated by oestradiol, insulin, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) or transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF-alpha). The potent metabolite of tamoxifen, trans 4'-hydroxytamoxifen (4'-OHT), alone also stimulated growth, whereas ICI 164384 did not. Oestradiol and insulin added together demonstrated a clear synergistic enhancement of cell growth. Correspondingly, the stimulatory effect of 4'-OHT on growth was magnified in the presence of insulin, and a combination of ICI 164384 with insulin revealed a much weaker stimulatory action of the 'pure' antagonist. For both compounds the interaction with insulin was complex and characterized by a bell-shaped dose-response curve. However, for 4'-OHT at all concentrations in the range 1 pM-1 microM in the presence of insulin, cell numbers were greater than in cultures exposed to insulin alone. This was not the case for ICI 164384 which suggested that differences in efficacy may be due to interactions between oestrogen and growth factor-mediated mechanisms. Furthermore, ICI 164384 was more effective in inhibiting the action of IGF-I and TGF-alpha alone or in combination, although both antioestrogens produced a partial blockade of growth factor responses in the complete absence of oestradiol. It is concluded that the difference in efficacy between partial agonist and 'pure' antagonist antioestrogens to inhibit growth in vitro is consistent with the difference in the pharmacological profile of these compounds. The absence of stimulatory activity of ICI 164384 is of particular significance in reducing to a minimum the synergistic interaction between oestrogens and insulin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
The uterotrophic and antiuterotrophic activities of tamoxifen and 6-hydroxy-2-(p-hydroxyphenyl)-benzo(b)thien-3-yl p- less than 2-(1-pyrrolidinyl) ethoxyphenyl ketone (LY 117018) in the immature rat uterus have been evaluated. The antioestrogens were administered alone, concurrently or sequentially with or without oestradiol. LY 117018 administered alone was less uterotrophic (oestrogenic) than tamoxifen. At high doses, when administered concurrently with oestradiol, LY 117018 was more antiuterotrophic (antioestrogenic) than tamoxifen. When uterine growth was maximally stimulated by prior treatment with oestradiol, tamoxifen and LY 117018 were equally effective in reducing uterine weight. However, when uterine growth was induced with a dose of oestradiol producing an oestrogenic effect equivalent to that of tamoxifen (but less that produced by LY 117018) LY 117018 was more effective than tamoxifen in reversing the uterotrophic effect of oestradiol. In animals pretreated with LY 117018 a further increase in uterine weight occurred on treatment with tamoxifen. The increase in uterine weight after tamoxifen was progressively reversed by increasing doses of LY 117018. The hypothesis that tamoxifen and LY 117018 may act by different mechanisms, based on the apparent failure of LY 117018 to antagonize the uterotrophic action of tamoxifen, is not supported by these studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.