BackgroundThe aim of the study is to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices among healthcare professionals in Barbados in relation to healthcare ethics and law in an attempt to assist in guiding their professional conduct and aid in curriculum development.MethodsA self-administered structured questionnaire about knowledge of healthcare ethics, law and the role of an Ethics Committee in the healthcare system was devised, tested and distributed to all levels of staff at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Barbados (a tertiary care teaching hospital) during April and May 2003.ResultsThe paper analyses 159 responses from doctors and nurses comprising junior doctors, consultants, staff nurses and sisters-in-charge. The frequency with which the respondents encountered ethical or legal problems varied widely from 'daily' to 'yearly'. 52% of senior medical staff and 20% of senior nursing staff knew little of the law pertinent to their work. 11% of the doctors did not know the contents of the Hippocratic Oath whilst a quarter of nurses did not know the Nurses Code. Nuremberg Code and Helsinki Code were known only to a few individuals. 29% of doctors and 37% of nurses had no knowledge of an existing hospital ethics committee. Physicians had a stronger opinion than nurses regarding practice of ethics such as adherence to patients' wishes, confidentiality, paternalism, consent for procedures and treating violent/non-compliant patients (p = 0.01)ConclusionThe study highlights the need to identify professionals in the workforce who appear to be indifferent to ethical and legal issues, to devise means to sensitize them to these issues and appropriately training them.

No abstract

Data on all patients scheduled to have elective and emergency surgeries during the period of 6 weeks from September 1999 to October 1999 were prospectively collected to determine scheduled starting times, actual starting times, completion times, causes for delays and cancellations. Of 840 procedures scheduled during the study period, 594 (71%) were available for analysis. Eighty-nine per cent of cancellations occurred in patients undergoing elective surgery. The common causes of cancellations were non-availability of beds in recovery room (RR) (15%), patients not showing up (9%), improper pre-operative patient preparation (13%), unavailability of nurses (11%) and anaesthetists (8%). Twenty-three per cent of the cancellations were day cases. Public patients were cancelled more frequently than private patients. Surgical procedures started on time in only 7% of patients. The most common cause of delay was due to delayed transport of patients to the operating theatre (17%). Optimal utilisation of operating theatres in our situation may be effected by increasing the bed-strength of ICUs to free the RR, proper pre-operative work up, adequate counselling of day-care surgery patients and efficient floor management of the operating theatre.

No abstract