The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) alanine dosimetry system is based on EPR measurements of radicals formed in alanine by ionizing radiation. The system has been studied to determine its energy dependence for photons in the 10-30 MV region relative to those of 60Co and to find out if the system would be suitable for dosimetry comparisons. The irradiations were carried out at the National Research Council, Ottawa, Canada and the doses ranged from 8 to 54 Gy. The EPR measurements were performed at the University of Oslo, Norway. The ratio of the slope of the alanine reading versus dose-to-water curve for a certain linac photon beam quality and the corresponding slope for a reference 60Co gamma-radiation gives an experimental measure of the relative dose-to-water response of the EPR alanine dosimetry system. For calculating the linear regression coefficients of these alanine reading versus dose curves, the method of weighted least squares was used. This method is assumed to produce more accurate regression coefficients when applied to EPR dosimetry than the common method of standard least squares. The overall uncertainty on the ratio of slopes was between 0.5 and 0.6% for all three linac energies. The relative response for all the linac beams compared to cobalt was less than unity: by about 0.5% for the 20 and 30 MV points but by more than 1% for the 10 MV point. The given standard uncertainties negate concluding that there is any significant internal variation in the measured response as a function of beam quality between the three linac energies. Thus, we calculated the average dose response for all three energies and found that the alanine response is 0.8% (+/-0.5%) lower for high energy x-rays than for 60Co gamma-rays. This result indicates a small energy dependence in the alanine response for the high-energy photons relative to 60Co which may be significant. This result is specific to our dosimetry system (alanine with 20% polyethylene binder pressed into a particular shape) including its waterproofing sleeve of PMMA (2 mm thick); however, we expect that this result may apply to other similar detectors.
The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the method of applicator reconstruction and/or the applicator orientation influence the dose calculation to points around the applicator for brachytherapy of cervical cancer with CT-based treatment planning. A phantom, containing a fixed ring applicator set and six lead pellets representing dose points, was used. The phantom was CT scanned with the ring applicator at four different angles related to the image plane. In each scan the applicator was reconstructed by three methods: (1) direct reconstruction in each image (DR), (2) reconstruction in multiplanar reconstructed images (MPR) and (3) library plans, using pre-defined applicator geometry (LIB). The doses to the lead pellets were calculated. The relative standard deviation (SD) for all reconstruction methods was less than 3.7% in the dose points. The relative SD for the LIB method was significantly lower (p < 0.05) than for the DR and MPR methods for all but two points. All applicator orientations had similar dose calculation reproducibility. Using library plans for applicator reconstruction gives the most reproducible dose calculation. However, with restrictive guidelines for applicator reconstruction the uncertainties for all methods are low compared to other factors influencing the accuracy of brachytherapy.
Alanine/agarose gel and alanine films in stacks have been used for measurements of absorbed dose around an HDR 192Ir source in a vaginal cylinder-applicator, with and without a 180 degrees tungsten shield. The gel and the films were analysed by means of ESR spectroscopy and calibrated against an ion chamber in a 4 MV photon beam to obtain absolute dose values. The gel serves as both dosimeter and phantom material, and the thin (130 microm) films are used to achieve an improved spatial resolution in the dose estimations. Experimental values were compared with Monte Carlo simulations using two different codes. Results from the measurements generally agree with the simulations to within 5%, for both the alanine/agarose gel and the alanine films.
Previous studies on human cervical cancer cells (NHIK 3025) have indicated that the cells, when X-irradiated in suspension, appeared to be more radiosensitive than when they were irradiated attached to glass dishes. However, this result depends on dosimetry, which is difficult in the situation where cells are attached to glass dishes due to backscattering electrons at the glass-liquid interface. Recently developed dosimetry that is based on detection of radiation-induced stable radicals in alanine and uses ESR spectroscopy offers a possibility for more relevant dosimetry at the glass-liquid interface than the previous estimates of doses based on Fricke dosimetry. Thin alanine films (>/=10 microm) were used to measure dose at the interface by irradiating the films while they were placed tightly against the bottom of dishes and covered with 1 mm of wax simulating the medium above cells. Fricke dosimetry was also performed, with different depths of Fricke solution in the dishes, to elucidate the contribution to the dose delivered by backscattering electrons at the glass-liquid interface. A dose rate of 1.9 Gy/min was measured with a thin layer (0.2-0.3 mm) of Fricke solution in petri dishes made of glass. However, this estimate appears to be too high, due to a contribution to dose by short-ranged electrons generated when the X rays passed through a steel lid 4.5 cm above the dishes. Dosimetry using alanine films resulted in dose rates of 1.15 and 0.87 Gy/min at the interfaces of glass-liquid and plastic- liquid, respectively. Hence there is a significant contribution to dose from backscattering electrons on dishes made of glass. The reason for our previous observation of a difference in radiosensitivity between cells irradiated in suspension and cells irradiated attached to glass appears to be a lack of accurate dosimetry at the glass-liquid interface.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.